Why the study?
The comparative effects of ARNI on clinical symptoms, echocardiographic parameters, and outcomes in HFrEF versus HFmrEF patients with coronary heart disease and chronic kidney disease were not established.
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve clinical symptoms, echocardiographic parameters, and outcomes differently in HFrEF compared to HFmrEF patients with coronary heart disease and chronic kidney disease?
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve clinical symptoms, echocardiographic parameters, and outcomes differently in HFrEF compared to HFmrEF patients with coronary heart disease and chronic kidney disease?
Sacubitril/valsartan provides greater improvements in morphofunctional remodeling parameters and clinical symptoms in HFrEF patients compared to HFmrEF patients with concomitant coronary heart disease and chronic kidney disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suggests greater LVEF benefit from sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF versus HFmrEF with CHD/CKD; hypothesis-generating, needs RCT confirmation.
Objective To compare the effects of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) on the clinical symptoms, echocardiographic parameters, and outcomes (cardiovascular death and hospitalization) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) patients with coronary heart disease and chronic kidney disease.Method A retrospective observational study was conducted from January 2018 to May 2019, with a follow-up period of 95.4 ± 57.8 days (8 months). Data from 127 patients were included.Results A statistically significant increase of 68.8% was observed in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in HFrEF patients compared to that in HFmrEF patients, with an increase of 27.2% at 8 months of follow-up. Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced left ventricular end-systolic volumes (LVESV) in HFrEF patients unlike in HFmrEF patients. The decrease in LVESV was 28.8% in HFrEF patients and 17.1% in HFmrEF patients. A significant reduction in the prevalence of severe secondary mitral regurgitation (EROA > 0.4 cm2) was observed in HFrEF compared to that in HFmrEF patients with the use of sacubitril/valsartan. A reduction of 15.6% was observed in HFrEF patients, whereas a reduction of 7.1% was observed in HFmrEF patients. Improvement in functional classification (NYHA) was observed during follow-up. The prevalence of (NYHA III) reduced from 50% to 15.7% in HFrEF patients, whereas a reduction from 21.1% to 8.8% was observed in HFmrEF patients. There was a significant reduction in NT-proBNP in HFrEF patients compared to that in HFmrEF patients. A reduction of 52% was observed in HFrEF patients, whereas a reduction of 28.7% was observed in HFmrEF pateints. Sacubitril/valsartan reduced primary endpoint events in both groups. The prevalence of HF-related hospitalization was higher in HFrEF than in HFmrEF patients: 12.1% vs 7.5%, respectively. The prevalence of CV death in HFrEF vs HFmrEF patients was 3.7% vs 0.5%, respectively. Cardiovascular (CV) death was higher in patients with atrial fibrillation in both groups.Conclusion Sacubitril/valsartan significantly improved morphofunctional remodeling parameters and clinical symptoms in HFrEF patients than in HFmrEF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raphael et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: