PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 26, 1997Archives of Internal Medicine218 citations

Treating Depressed Primary Care Patients Improves Their Physical, Mental, and Social Functioning

View Full Paper
JCJohn L. Coulehan

Key Result

Standardized depression-specific treatment resulted in significantly greater improvement on the SF-36 mental summary scale and most individual scales compared with usual care at 8 months.

Study Design

Type

RCT

Randomization

randomized

Structured PICO

Does protocol intervention (nortriptyline or interpersonal psychotherapy) improve functional status in primary care patients with major depressive disorder compared to usual care?

P
Population
Primary care patients with major depressive disorder
I
Intervention
Protocol intervention (nortriptyline hydrochloride or interpersonal psychotherapy)
C
Comparator
Usual care with the patient's physician
O
Outcome
Functional status evaluated using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Global Assessment Scale at 8 monthspatient reported

Standardized depression-specific treatment (nortriptyline or interpersonal psychotherapy) improves mental and social functioning more than usual care in primary care patients with major depressive disorder.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study describes the functioning of primary care patients with major depressive disorder, the relationship of medical comorbidity to functional status, and the effects of depression-specific treatment on functional status after 8 months. METHODS: Patients were randomized to a protocol intervention (nortriptyline hydrochloride or interpersonal psychotherapy) or to usual care with the patient's physician in a clinical trial of primary care treatments of depression. Their functional status was evaluated using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Global Assessment Scale. Medical comorbidity was assessed with the Duke Severity of Illness Checklist. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and Beck Depression Inventory were used to measure depressive severity. Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 1, 2, 4, and 8 months after randomization. RESULTS: At baseline, patients reported substantial impairments in the functional domains as assessed by the SF-36 and Global Assessment Scale. Severity of general medical illness and depression were not correlated. Greater medical comorbidity was associated with diminished physical, but not psychological, functioning. Mean scores on SF-36 scales and the Global Assessment Scale improved significantly during the 8 months of follow-up. Patients assigned to protocol treatments showed greater improvement, compared with those assigned to usual care, on the SF-36 mental summary scale and most individual scales but not on the SF-36 physical summary scale. However, patients who completed protocol treatment also experienced significant improvement on the physical summary scale. Medical comorbidity was only a weak predictor of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care patients with major depressive disorder report substantial impairments in physical, psychological, and social functioning on initial assessment. Severity of baseline medical comorbidity did not correlate with severity of depression and only weakly correlated with functional status at 8 months. Functional impairments improve with time, but standardized depression-specific treatment is associated with greater improvement in more domains of functioning than is a physician's usual care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

John L. Coulehan (1997) conducted an RCT in major depressive disorder. Protocol intervention (nortriptyline hydrochloride or interpersonal psychotherapy) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Functional status evaluated using the SF-36 and Global Assessment Scale. Standardized depression-specific treatment resulted in significantly greater improvement on the SF-36 mental summary scale and most individual scales compared with usual care at 8 months.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0c7545e28175e95a23587bhttps://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1997.00440310079008
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Screening Depressed Patients in Family Practice1972 · 1,852 citations
  2. 2Treating Major Depression in Primary Care Practice1996 · 434 citations
  3. 3Major Depression in Primary Care Practice1995 · 67 citations
  4. 4Treatments of Depression and the Functional Capacity to Work1992 · 572 citations
  5. 5Associations among family support, family stress, and personal functional health status1989 · 107 citations