Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This interview explores the emergence of a digital sociology of interpreting — a transformative framework reshaping interpreting studies. The conversation traces the evolution from traditional qualitative approaches to methods that incorporate digital data, social media analytics, and algorithmic labor. It examines how digital technologies are redefining professional practices, hierarchies, and agency within the interpreting profession. Key themes include methodological challenges, ethical dilemmas posed by AI-driven augmentation and remote interpreting, and the shifting boundaries between human expertise and machine assistance. The discussion also addresses the implications of digital platforms and reputational systems on interpreter visibility and power dynamics, drawing on critical insights from feminist and sociological perspectives. Overall, the interview provides actionable knowledge for scholars, practitioners, and policymakers, illuminating how digitalization is altering the practice of interpreting and expanding its research horizons in a rapidly transforming technological landscape.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monzó-Nebot et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: