Why the study?
The prognostic value of insulin resistance indices in patients with acute aortic dissection remains unclear.
Does an elevated triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index predict major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in patients with acute aortic dissection?
Does an elevated triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index predict major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in patients with acute aortic dissection?
An elevated triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index is an independent predictor of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in patients with acute aortic dissection, particularly in males and smokers.
Hypothesis-generating for TyG in acute aortic dissection; prospective validation needed before any clinical use.
Background The prognostic value of insulin resistance (IR) indices in patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD) remains unclear. This study investigated the associations between four IR indices and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in AAD patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 114 AAD patients from Henan Chest Hospital (December 2017-December 2023). Four IR indices were calculated: triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, TyG-BMI index, TG/HDL-C ratio, and METS-IR. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate associations with MACCEs. Subgroup analyses were performed in male, hypertensive, diabetic, and smoking patients. Results Among 114 patients (mean age 50.67 ± 12.49 years), 55 (48.2%) developed MACCEs. In fully adjusted models, only TyG index independently predicted MACCEs (OR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.24–4.90, p = 0.010). Subgroup analyses revealed robust associations in male patients (OR = 2.87, 95% CI: 1.24–6.65, p = 0.014) and smokers (OR = 3.13, 95% CI: 1.05–9.31, p = 0.040), but not in hypertensive patients. Conclusions An elevated TyG index independently predicts MACCEs in AAD patients, particularly in males and smokers, and may support risk stratification and intensified follow-up in high-risk individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: