Why the study?
Coronary CT angiography is increasingly used in emergency departments for chest pain evaluation, but its role in directing preventive therapy at discharge remains unclear.
Do coronary CT angiography findings of non-obstructive or obstructive CAD increase the likelihood of statin initiation at emergency department discharge compared to findings of no CAD?
Observational (n=1,410)
No
Do coronary CT angiography findings of non-obstructive or obstructive CAD increase the likelihood of statin initiation at emergency department discharge compared to findings of no CAD?
Odds Ratio: 35.4 (95% CI 8.8–142.1)
p-value: p=<0.0001
While CCTA findings of CAD in the ED strongly predict statin initiation, massive treatment gaps persist, with 90% of patients with non-obstructive CAD being discharged without preventive therapy despite their elevated ASCVD risk.
• This study extends prior evidence by evaluating how CCTA findings influence statin initiation and preventive care at ED discharge in real-world practice. • While CCTA findings strongly predict statin initiation, cardiology referral, and patient education, notable gaps in preventive care continue. • In obstructive CAD, 80% of patients were started on statins, but 1 in 5 remained untreated, reflecting suboptimal adherence to guideline-based care. • In non-obstructive CAD, only ∼10% of patients were initiated on statins, underscoring a critical missed opportunity for timely, personalized prevention despite its established link to elevated ASCVD risk. • Integrating CCTA-guided preventive therapy into standardized ED workflows could close treatment gaps efficiently and reduce ASCVD burden in the current value-based care landscape. Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is increasingly used in emergency departments (ED) for chest pain evaluation, but its role in directing preventive therapy at discharge remains unclear. We aimed to determine whether CCTA findings were associated with statin initiation at discharge and to identify gaps in preventive care. We conducted a retrospective observational study of adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing CCTA for chest pain in the ED of a large academic hospital. CCTA findings were categorized as no CAD, non-obstructive CAD (<50% stenosis), or obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis). The primary outcome was statin initiation at discharge among statin-naïve patients. Secondary outcomes included cardiology referral and heart disease education. We applied multivariable Firth logistic regression for the primary outcome and modified Poisson regression with robust variance for secondary outcomes. Of 1410 participants (mean age=53.5±10.9 years; 52.8% female), 723 (51.3%) had no CAD and 687 (48.7%) had CAD (69.3% non-obstructive, 30.7% obstructive). In statin-naïve patients (n=1,120), statin initiation rates were 79.7% for obstructive CAD and 9.5% for non-obstructive CAD. Adjusted models showed higher statin initiation with obstructive CAD (OR=97.0, 95% CI: 22.9–410.5) and non-obstructive CAD (OR=18.2, 95% CI: 4.8–69.1) compared with no CAD. Cardiology referral occurred in 96.2% of obstructive and 83.2% of non-obstructive CAD; education was documented in 83.4% and 52.1%, respectively. CCTA findings strongly predict statin initiation at discharge, yet large treatment gaps persist, especially in non-obstructive CAD. Routine ED CCTA provides a missed but actionable opportunity to initiate guideline-based therapy and reduce ASCVD burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shrestha et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Chest pain (suspected coronary artery disease) (n=1,410). CCTA-detected coronary artery disease (CAD) vs. No coronary artery disease was evaluated on Statin initiation at emergency department discharge among statin-naïve patients (OR 35.4, 95% CI 8.8-142.1, p=<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: