Key result
Extending CHA2DS2-VASc with clinical data improves major event prediction after AMI.
Why the study?
Although the CHA2DS2-VASc score predicts poor prognosis in AMI, the study aimed to evaluate it alone and extended with clinical data to predict adverse events after AMI.
Does an extended CHA2DS2-VASc score model improve prediction of major adverse events compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score alone in patients after acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=1,371)
Yes
Does an extended CHA2DS2-VASc score model improve prediction of major adverse events compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score alone in patients after acute myocardial infarction?
Adding clinical data to the CHA2DS2-VASc score significantly improves the prediction of major adverse events in patients following acute myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May improve post-AMI MAE prediction with extended CHA2DS2-VASc; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Background The CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score predicts poor prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), with or without atrial fibrillation. In this observational study, we aimed to evaluate the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score by itself and extended with clinical data to predict adverse events in patients after AMI. Methods In this longitudinal observational study, we used a cohort of 955 patients hospitalised for AMI at Västmanland County Hospital, Västerås, Sweden, to derive prediction models. The CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score alone and combined with clinical data (systolic blood pressure, creatinine level, ST-segment elevation and diuretic use at discharge) was analysed using Cox regression to evaluate the risk of major adverse events (MAE), defined as all-cause death or hospitalisation due to recurrent MI, heart failure or ischaemic stroke. Discriminatory performance was presented as the time-dependent area under the curve (tdAUC). The prediction models were validated in 416 patients with AMI hospitalised at Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. Results During a median of 2.5 years, 287 (30.1%) patients experienced MAE. CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores of 2, 4 and 6 were associated with fourfold, ninefold and 18-fold increases in the relative risk of MAE, respectively, with a tdAUC of 0.76 at a 2-year follow-up. Extending the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score with clinical data significantly improved the prediction model (p<0.001), yielding a tdAUC of 0.81. The models performed well in the validation cohort, with satisfactory calibration and tdAUC values of 0.70–0.78. Conclusion The addition of clinical data to the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was superior to a model with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc alone in predicting adverse events in patients after AMI, and the model performed well in external validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carlsson et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=1,371). Extended CHA2DS2-VASc score (with systolic blood pressure, creatinine level, ST-segment elevation and diuretic use) vs. CHA2DS2-VASc score alone was evaluated on Major adverse events (MAE), defined as all-cause death or hospitalisation due to recurrent MI, heart failure or ischaemic stroke (tdAUC 0.81 vs 0.76, p=<0.001). Extending the CHA2DS2-VASc score with clinical data significantly improved the prediction of major adverse events after AMI compared to the score alone (tdAUC 0.81 vs 0.76; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: