This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The role of NO in regulating the focal adhesion proteins, Src, FAK, p130 Cas, and PTP-α, was investigated. Fibroblasts expressing PTP-α (PTP-α WT cells), fibroblasts “knockout” for PTP-α (PTP-α −/− cells), and “rescued” “knockout” fibroblasts (PTP-α A5/3 cells) were stimulated with either S -nitroso- N -acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) or fetal bovine serum (FBS). FBS increased inducible NO synthase in both cell lines. Activation of Src mediated either by SNAP or by FBS occurred independent of dephosphorylation of Tyr527 in PTP-α −/− cells. Both stimuli promoted dephosphorylation of Tyr527 and activation of Src kinase in PTP-α WT cells. NO-mediated activation of Src kinase affected the activities of FAK and p130Cas and was dependent on the expression of PTP-α. Analogous to tyrosine phosphorylation, SNAP and FBS stimulated differential generation of NO and S -nitrosylation of Src kinase in both cell lines. Incubation with SNAP resulted in higher levels of NO and S -nitrosylation of immunoprecipitated Src in PTP-α −/− cells (oxidizing redox environment) as compared with the levels of NO and S -nitrosylated Src in PTP-α WT cells (reducing redox environment). SNAP differentially stimulated cell proliferation of both cell lines is dependent on the intracellular redox environment, Src activity, and PTP-α expression. This dependence also is observed with FBS-stimulated cell migration. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 13, 109–125.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Curcio et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: