Key result
Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed in 16 patients with congenital heart defects and 45 controls to differentiate tricuspid atresia from other hypoplastic right heart syndromes.
Why the study?
Does two-dimensional echocardiography differentiate tricuspid atresia from other hypoplastic right heart syndromes and common atrioventricular canal?
Observational (n=61)
Does two-dimensional echocardiography differentiate tricuspid atresia from other hypoplastic right heart syndromes and common atrioventricular canal?
Two-dimensional echocardiography was evaluated for its ability to diagnose and differentiate tricuspid atresia from other congenital heart defects.
May support 2D echo differentiation of tricuspid atresia; leaves open prospective validation in larger cohorts.
Echocardiographic studies were performed in 8 patients with tricuspid atresia, 3 patients with other types of hypoplastic right heart syndromes, and 5 patients with common atrioventricular canal. Echocardiographic searching was performed mainly along the horizontal section at the level of the membranous septum of the heart. Conventional and two-dimensional (cross-sectional) echocardiograms were recorded. The findings were compared with those from the echocardiograms of 25 healthy subjects, 17 patients with mitral valve disease, and 3 patients with congestive cardiomyopathy who served as a control group as they had normal arrangements ofthe intracardiac structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beppu et al. (1978) conducted an observational in Tricuspid atresia and other hypoplastic right heart syndromes (n=61). Two-dimensional echocardiography vs. Control group with normal intracardiac structures was evaluated on Differentiation of tricuspid atresia from other hypoplastic right heart syndromes and common atrioventricular canal. Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed in 16 patients with congenital heart defects and 45 controls to differentiate tricuspid atresia from other hypoplastic right heart syndromes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: