Key result
Mesenchymal stromal cells yield inconclusive clinical trial outcomes for AMI despite preclinical promise.
Why the study?
Despite promising preclinical results for mesenchymal stromal/stem cells in acute myocardial infarction, clinical trial findings have been inconclusive and inconsistent due to variations such as the injection time window.
Does the use of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells improve cardiac function and reduce infarct size following acute myocardial infarction?
Does the use of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells improve cardiac function and reduce infarct size following acute myocardial infarction?
The therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cells in acute myocardial infarction remains inconclusive in clinical trials, highlighting the need to optimize parameters such as injection timing and cell preparation.
Should not yet change practice for mesenchymal stromal cells in acute MI; leaves open optimization of timing and preparation in future trials.
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of cardiovascular death and remains the most common cause of heart failure. Reopening of the occluded artery, i.e., reperfusion, is the only way to save the myocardium. However, the expected benefits of reducing infarct size are disappointing due to the reperfusion paradox, which also induces specific cell death. These ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) lesions can account for up to 50% of final infarct size, a major determinant for both mortality and the risk of heart failure (morbidity). In this review, we provide a detailed description of the cell death and inflammation mechanisms as features of I/R injury and cardioprotective strategies such as ischemic postconditioning as well as their underlying mechanisms. Due to their biological properties, the use of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) has been considered a potential therapeutic approach in AMI. Despite promising results and evidence of safety in preclinical studies using MSCs, the effects reported in clinical trials are not conclusive and even inconsistent. These discrepancies were attributed to many parameters such as donor age, in vitro culture, and storage time as well as injection time window after AMI, which alter MSC therapeutic properties. In the context of AMI, future directions will be to generate MSCs with enhanced properties to limit cell death in myocardial tissue and thereby reduce infarct size and improve the healing phase to increase postinfarct myocardial performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barrère‐Lemaire et al. (2023) conducted a review in Acute myocardial infarction. Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) was evaluated. Despite promising preclinical results, the use of mesenchymal stromal cells in acute myocardial infarction has yielded inconclusive and inconsistent clinical trial outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: