PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 10, 1998Circulation714 citations

Right Bundle-Branch Block and ST-Segment Elevation in Leads V 1 Through V 3

View Full Paper
JBJosép BrugadaRBRamón BrugadaPBPedro Brugada

Key Result

An implantable defibrillator resulted in 0% mortality compared to 26% with pharmacological therapy and 31% with no therapy in patients with RBBB and ST elevation in V1-V3 (P=0.0005).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=63)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does an implantable defibrillator prevent sudden death compared to pharmacological therapy or no treatment in patients with an ECG pattern of right bundle-branch block and ST-segment elevation in leads V1 through V3?

P
Population
63 patients (57 men; mean age, 38+/-17 years) without demonstrable structural heart disease and an ECG pattern of right bundle-branch block and ST-segment elevation in leads V1 through V3.
I
Intervention
Implantable automatic defibrillator (n=35)
C
Comparator
Pharmacological therapy with beta-blockers and/or amiodarone (n=15) or no treatment (n=13)
O
Outcome
Arrhythmic events and sudden deathhard clinical

In patients with an ECG pattern of right bundle-branch block and ST-segment elevation in leads V1 through V3 (Brugada syndrome), an implantable defibrillator effectively prevents sudden death, whereas pharmacological therapy with amiodarone and/or beta-blockers does not.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 31%

p-value: p=0.0005

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Five years ago, we described a specific ECG pattern of right bundle-branch block and ST-segment elevation in leads V1 through V3 associated with sudden death in patients without demonstrable structural heart disease. Information on long-term outcome has become available due to pooled data on a large cohort of patients with this syndrome who are followed at 33 centers worldwide. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on 63 patients (57 men; mean age, 38+/-17 years) with the described ECG pattern were analyzed in terms of arrhythmic events and sudden death. Events were analyzed for patients with at least one episode of aborted sudden death or syncope of unknown origin before recognition of the syndrome (symptomatic patients, n=41) and for patients in whom the ECG pattern was recognized by chance or because of screening related to sudden death of a relative (asymptomatic patients, n=22). During a mean follow-up of 34+/-32 months, an arrhythmic event occurred in 14 symptomatic patients (34%) and 6 asymptomatic patients (27%). An automatic defibrillator was implanted in 35 patients, 15 received pharmacological therapy with beta-blockers and/or amiodarone, and 13 did not receive treatment The incidence of arrhythmic events was similar in all therapy groups (log-rank 0.86); however, total mortality was 0% in the implantable defibrillator group, 26% in the pharmacological group, and 31% in the no therapy group (log-rank 0.0005). All mortality was due to sudden death. CONCLUSIONS: Patients without demonstrable structural heart disease and an ECG pattern of right bundle-branch block and ST-segment elevation in leads V1 through V3 are at risk for sudden death. Amiodarone and/or beta-blockers do not protect them against sudden death, and an implantable defibrillator seems to be the present treatment of choice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Brugada et al. (1998) conducted a cohort in Right bundle-branch block and ST-segment elevation in leads V1 through V3 without structural heart disease (n=63). Implantable defibrillator vs. Pharmacological therapy or no treatment was evaluated on Total mortality (p=0.0005). An implantable defibrillator resulted in 0% mortality compared to 26% with pharmacological therapy and 31% with no therapy in patients with RBBB and ST elevation in V1-V3 (P=0.0005).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0cfacdb31ab1d6e01e7474https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.97.5.457
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper