Key result
An mPAP/CO slope exceeding 3 mmHg/L/min diagnoses exercise-induced PH and strongly correlates with adverse outcomes.
Why the study?
Traditional absolute pressure cut-offs for exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension can cause false positives and false negatives, prompting evaluation of the flow-corrected mPAP over cardiac output slope.
Does the mPAP/CO slope provide a more reliable diagnosis of exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension compared to absolute mPAP cut-offs?
Does the mPAP/CO slope provide a more reliable diagnosis of exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension compared to absolute mPAP cut-offs?
The review highlights the mPAP/CO slope as a superior, physiologically sound metric for diagnosing exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension, achievable non-invasively through stress echocardiography.
May enhance noninvasive exercise PH diagnosis via stress echo; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension (exPHT) is a haemodynamic condition linked to increased morbidity and mortality across various cardiopulmonary diseases. Traditional definitions of exPHT rely on absolute cut-offs, such as mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) above 30 mmHg during exercise. However, recent research suggests that these cut-offs may not accurately reflect pathophysiological changes, leading to false positives and false negatives. Instead, the mPAP over cardiac output (CO) slope, which incorporates both pressure and flow measurements, has emerged as a more reliable indicator. A slope exceeding 3 mmHg/L/min is now considered diagnostic for exPHT and strongly correlates with adverse outcomes. Stress echocardiography serves as a viable alternative to invasive assessment, enabling broader implementation. This review discusses the physiological basis of pulmonary haemodynamics during exercise, the advantages of the mPAP/CO slope over absolute pressure measurements, the evidence supporting its inclusion in clinical guidelines, and provides a practical guide for non-invasive determining the mPAP/CO slope in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhont et al. (2024) conducted a review in Exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension (exPHT). mPAP over cardiac output (CO) slope vs. Absolute pressure cut-offs was evaluated. The mPAP over cardiac output slope exceeding 3 mmHg/L/min is considered diagnostic for exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension and strongly correlates with adverse outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: