Why the study?
To provide an overview of the prognostic implications of exercise pulmonary hypertension in patients with various common cardiac and pulmonary diseases.
What are the prognostic implications of exercise pulmonary hypertension in patients with cardiac and pulmonary diseases?
What are the prognostic implications of exercise pulmonary hypertension in patients with cardiac and pulmonary diseases?
Exercise pulmonary hypertension (mPAP/CO slope > 3 mmHg/l/min) is a valuable early prognostic marker in patients with cardiac and pulmonary diseases.
exPH per new slope definition may refine risk stratification in cardiac/pulmonary disease; leaves open whether routine assessment improves outcomes.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we provide an overview of the prognostic implications of exPH in patients with various common cardiac and pulmonary diseases. RECENT FINDINGS: Exercise pulmonary hypertension (exPH) has been recently re-introduced in the current European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society pulmonary hypertension guidelines. Accordingly, exPH is defined as a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP)/cardiac output ( CO ) slope greater than 3 mmHg/l/min. Key considerations for this re-introduction included increasing understanding on normal pulmonary hemodynamics during exercise and the broadly available evidence on the association of an abnormal mPAP/ CO slope with poor survival in the general population and in different disease entities. SUMMARY: Exercise (patho-)physiology has opened a new field for clinical research facilitating recognition of cardiovascular and pulmonary vascular diseases in an early stage. Such early recognition with significant prognostic and possibly therapeutic relevance, but being undetectable at rest, makes exercise pulmonary hemodynamics particularly interesting for common diseases, such as valvular heart disease, left heart disease, and chronic pulmonary disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeder et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: