Key result
Basic CPR training linked to ~34% greater knowledge and improved attitudes among football professionals.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate changes in attitudes and knowledge regarding basic CPR among football professionals following a training intervention, and examine correlations with sociodemographic variables.
Does basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation training improve knowledge and attitudes in professional football players and coaches?
Observational (n=206)
Does basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation training improve knowledge and attitudes in professional football players and coaches?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.6% vs 5.66%
p-value: p=<0.001
A 2-hour basic CPR training session significantly improves short-term knowledge and attitudes regarding CPR among professional football players and coaches.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the change in attitudes and knowledge about basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation in football professionals following a training intervention and to examine its correlation with sociodemographic variables. Method: The study consists of two phases. The first phase involves an observational cross-sectional study to assess the level of attitude and knowledge in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The second phase includes an educational intervention consisting of a training and practical session on basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation, with a pre-post single-group study. The questionnaire was completed by football professionals from the Spanish first division and their coaches, with N = 206 in the first phase and N = 70, 30 days after the training intervention in the second phase. A possible limitation is that the final sample size is smaller than the initial one; however, it still exceeds the estimated minimum. A two-phase statistical analysis was conducted: a cross-sectional analysis using nonparametric tests (Wilcoxon, Kruskal–Wallis and Spearman) assessed baseline attitude and knowledge in relation to sociodemographic variables, followed by a pre-post intervention analysis using parametric ( t -tests, ANOVA, and Pearson) or nonparametric tests depending on data distribution to evaluate intra- and inter-group changes. Normality was tested with the Shapiro–Wilk test and appropriate tests were applied accordingly. Results: There is a significant increase ( p < 0.001) in the average attitude of participants between before (4.25 ± 0.39) and after (4.40 ± 0.41) the intervention. Knowledge also shows a significant increase ( p < 0.001) between before (5.66 ± 1.92) and after (7.60 ± 1.84) the intervention. There is no significant correlation with age, gender, professional category, or levels of knowledge and attitudes. Conclusions: The basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation training intervention has proven beneficial, regardless of gender, educational level, or category studied (players/coaches).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
González-Moret et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge and attitudes (n=206). Basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation training and practical session vs. Pre-intervention baseline was evaluated on Change in knowledge about basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (p=<0.001). A basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation training intervention significantly increased knowledge (from 5.66 to 7.60; p<0.001) and attitudes (from 4.25 to 4.40; p<0.001) among football professionals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: