Key result
Myocardial perfusion SPECT showed similar positive ischemia rates in AF patients and controls (11% vs 17%, P=0.16), but less often indicated true CAD on angiography in AF (15% vs 67%, P=0.006).
Why the study?
Does myocardial perfusion SPECT adequately assess the risk of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to controls?
Case-Control (n=253)
Does myocardial perfusion SPECT adequately assess the risk of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 11% vs 17%
p-value: p=0.16
Myocardial perfusion SPECT has a high false-positive rate for detecting significant coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation, highlighting the need for alternative non-invasive diagnostic modalities in this population.
AIMS: The role of coronary artery disease (CAD) in atrial fibrillation (AF) is poorly investigated. This study investigated the value of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the assessment of risk of CAD in patients with a history of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Out of consecutive patients without previous coronary angiogram or history of CAD referred for SPECT, patients with a history of AF (n = 129) were compared with age- and gender-matched controls (n = 124). Primary endpoint was positive SPECT, i.e. unambiguous signs of ischaemia. There was no significant difference with regard to positive SPECT outcome between AF patients and controls (14 patients, 11% vs. 21 patients, 17%; P = 0.16). Coronary angiography (CAG) performed after SPECT demonstrated a higher yield of positive SPECT regarding significant CAD in control patients (10 out of 15 patients, 67%) than in AF patients (2 out of 13 patients, 15%; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Positive SPECT outcome was similar in patients with AF and in controls. Nevertheless, in AF patients a positive SPECT outcome was less often related to significant CAD in those patients who subsequently underwent CAG. These results emphasize the need for new non-invasive techniques to adequately assess the risk of significant CAD in AF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smit et al. (2009) conducted a case-control in Atrial fibrillation (n=253). Myocardial perfusion SPECT vs. Age- and gender-matched controls without AF was evaluated on Positive SPECT (unambiguous signs of ischaemia) (p=0.16). Myocardial perfusion SPECT showed similar positive ischemia rates in AF patients and controls (11% vs 17%, P=0.16), but less often indicated true CAD on angiography in AF (15% vs 67%, P=0.006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: