Key result
Genetically determined NT-proBNP is linked to ~11% higher adiponectin per doubling, suggesting reverse causation.
Why the study?
High adiponectin levels are paradoxically linked to increased cardiovascular disease and heart failure risk in high-risk individuals, leaving its relationship with heart function unclear.
Does genetically-determined NT-proBNP affect adiponectin concentrations, and is adiponectin associated with heart function?
Observational (n=1,138)
Yes
Does genetically-determined NT-proBNP affect adiponectin concentrations, and is adiponectin associated with heart function?
Effect estimate: 11.4% higher (95% CI 1.7, 21.6)
The study suggests that the paradoxical association between high adiponectin and heart failure is likely due to reverse causation, where increased NT-proBNP drives higher adiponectin levels.
Supports reverse causation explaining high adiponectin in HF; leaves open direct effects on cardiac function.
High adiponectin concentrations are generally regarded as beneficial with regard to cardiometabolic health, but have been paradoxically associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk, specifically heart failure, in individuals at high cardiovascular risk. We aimed to investigate the association between adiponectin and heart function parameters, and inversely, we estimated the effect of genetically-determined heart function and NT-proBNP as the main marker of heart failure on adiponectin using Mendelian randomisation. Observational analyses between adiponectin and measures of heart function, i.e. E/A ratio, left, and right ventricular ejection fraction, were performed in participants of the Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity (NEO) study, assessed by MRI of the heart (n = 1,138). Two-sample Mendelian randomisation analyses were conducted to estimate the effect of NT-proBNP and heart function on adiponectin concentrations using publicly-available summary statistics (ADIPOGen; the PLATO trial). The mean (standard deviation) age was 56 (6) years and mean body mass index was 26 (4) kg/m2. Per five μg/mL higher adiponectin, the E/A ratio was −0.05 (95 % CI: −0.10, −0.01) lower, left ventricle ejection fraction was −0.5 % (95 % CI: −1.1, 0.1) lower, and right ventricle ejection fraction was 0.5 % (95 % CI: −0.1, 1.2) higher. Genetically-determined NT-proBNP was causally related to adiponectin concentrations in ADIPOGen: per doubling of genetically-determined NT-proBNP, adiponectin concentrations were 11.4 % (95 % CI: 1.7, 21.6) higher. With causal MR methods we showed that NT-proBNP affects adiponectin concentrations, while adiponectin is not associated with heart function parameters. Therefore, reverse causation may explain the adiponectin paradox observed in previous studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christen et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=1,138). Genetically-determined NT-proBNP was evaluated on Adiponectin concentrations (11.4% higher, 95% CI 1.7, 21.6). Genetically-determined NT-proBNP was causally related to adiponectin concentrations, with an 11.4% increase per doubling of NT-proBNP (95% CI 1.7-21.6), suggesting reverse causation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: