Shows improved visual acuity and subjective quality of vision after bilateral IOL implantation, indicating successful outcomes.
Richard N McNeely,1 Stephen A Stewart,1,2 Niraj Mandal,1 Jonathan E Moore1,3,4 1Cathedral Eye Clinic, Belfast, NI, UK; 2School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queenâs University, Belfast, NI, UK; 3College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK; 4Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, Peopleâs Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jonathan E Moore, Cathedral Eye Clinic, Belfast, NI, UK, Email jmoorecathedral@gmail.comPurpose: To outline the early postoperative visual performance and subjective quality of vision (QoV) after implantation of a new fully refractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens (IOL).Patients and Methods: The study enrolled 103 patients undergoing bilateral phacoemulsification with implantation of the Tecnis PureSee IOL (Johnson & Johnson). Refraction, uncorrected (UDVA) and best-corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, uncorrected intermediate (UIVA) and near (UNVA) visual acuities, defocus curves, electronic reading desk, QoV questionnaire and a halo and glare simulator were evaluated 3 months postoperatively.Results: Mean binocular UDVA, UIVA and UNVA were â 0.06 ± 0.07, 0.05 ± 0.08 and 0.20 ± 0.08 logMAR respectively. At 3 months, 83% were within ± 0.50D and 99% within ± 1.00D of the refractive aim. Minimal dysphotopsias and overall QoV scores of 8.68 ± 1.13 for the day and 8.08 ± 1.58 at night were reported. Of all patients, 98.1% reported better vision than preoperatively and 86.4% would recommend the procedure. Spectacle independence for distance, intermediate, and near was achieved in 100%, 94.2% and 66% of patients respectively.Conclusion: The Tecnis PureSee IOL provided excellent distance and intermediate vision with good functional near vision. Patients reported high postoperative QoV and subjective functional vision, with minimal visual side effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McNeely et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: