Key result
Arterial pulse-distribution analysis discriminates breast cancer patients from controls with 0.74 AUC, outperforming machine learning.
Why the study?
Breast cancer is a major health threat needing accessible screening, and cardiovascular characteristics can be altered in these patients.
Does arterial pulse-waveform analysis discriminate breast cancer patients from age-matched controls?
Case-Control (n=127)
Does arterial pulse-waveform analysis discriminate breast cancer patients from age-matched controls?
Arterial pulse-waveform analysis using a novel pulse-distribution analysis can discriminate breast cancer patients from controls, providing a potential physiological basis for noninvasive screening tools.
May support PDA as a vascular marker for breast cancer; leaves open prospective validation before screening use.
Background/Aim Breast cancer (BC) remains a major health threat, highlighting the need for accessible screening. Characteristics of the cardiovascular system can be altered in BC patients. This study explored a noninvasive method combining arterial pulse-waveform analysis and classification to compare arterial pulse-waveform characteristics between BC patients ( n = 51)) and age-matched controls ( n = 76)). Methods From one-minute radial waveform recordings, 40 harmonic indices (amplitude proportions, phase angles, and their variability) were derived. Significant differences in pulse-waveform indices were observed between groups, suggesting altered pulse-wave transmission conditions in BC patients. Two classifiers were compared: machine learning and a novel pulse-distribution analysis (PDA). Results PDA demonstrated an acceptable discrimination with an AUC of 0.74, outperforming machine learning (AUC up to 0.58). Subgroup analysis by clinical factors such as TNM stage showed variable performance, with AUCs ranging from 0.66-0.93. Discrimination appeared to improve with disease progression (AUC 0.86 for stage IV), suggesting that tumor-induced vascular alterations may affect pulse-wave transmission. Conclusion The primary contribution of this work is the identification of distinct pulse-waveform signatures in BC patients, providing a physiological basis for future development of noninvasive screening tools. The proposed method, characterized by its low cost and ease of use, warrants further validation in larger cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) conducted a case-control in Breast cancer (n=127). Pulse-distribution analysis (PDA) of arterial pulse waveforms vs. Machine learning was evaluated on Discrimination between breast cancer patients and controls (AUC 0.74). Pulse-distribution analysis of arterial pulse waveforms discriminated breast cancer patients from controls with an AUC of 0.74, outperforming machine learning (AUC up to 0.58).
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: