Retrospective cohort study examines treatment patterns and loss to follow-up in women with OAB, suggesting implications for care.
Importance Loss to follow-up for overactive bladder (OAB) care is common and inadequately understood. Objectives The objective of this study was to estimate the association between race, ethnicity, socioeconomic advantage, and loss to follow-up in women initiating OAB treatment. Secondary objectives included comparing treatment patterns. Study Design This study included a retrospective cohort of patients initiating OAB treatment at an academic, tertiary referral center, September 1, 2016, to March 1, 2022. Women with baseline OAB symptom severity data who self-reported language, race, and ethnicity were included. The underrepresented cohort was defined as those self-identifying as Black or Spanish-speaking, Hispanic. Socioeconomic advantage was quantified using the area deprivation index (ADI). To detect a relative risk of 1.3 for loss to follow-up (no follow-up within 13 months of initiating treatment, α= 0.05, β=0.2, 1:3 ratio), 632 patients were needed. Results Six hundred thirty-two patients (mean age 60.48 ± 15.57 y) were included; 159/632 (25%) were underrepresented. Underrepresented patients had an increased risk of loss to follow-up on regression analysis adjusted for socioeconomic advantage, insurance, symptom impact, and menopause status (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 6.91, 95% CI: 1.69–28.26). The ADI was associated with loss to follow-up on models adjusted for insurance, prolapse stage, symptoms and menopause status (aRR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.004–1.07, P =0.03). There were differences related to initial treatment with anticholinergic medication (34.1% Black, 50.7% Hispanic, 24.9% White, P <0.01), first follow-up (26.3 + 40.9 wk Black, 12.8 + 19.3 wk Hispanic, and 17.1 + 17 wk White, P <0.01), and receipt of advanced therapies (8.0% Black, 2.8% Hispanic, 12.9% White, P =0.02). Conclusion Sociodemographic variables may be associated with treatment patterns after initiating care for OAB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shinnick et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: