Key result
Non-ischaemic DCM affects ~1 in 220 individuals, predominantly men, often driven by pathogenic genetic variants.
Why the study?
A deeper understanding of genetic factors and the epidemiological landscape of non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy is needed to improve clinical management and optimize screening protocols and public health strategies.
This review highlights the updated prevalence and complex genetic architecture of non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy to optimize clinical management and screening.
Supports heightened clinical vigilance for non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy; leaves open optimal screening thresholds and sex-specific interventions.
Dilated cardiomyopathy, defined by left ventricular dilatation and systolic dysfunction, is a major cause of heart failure, heart transplantation and sudden cardiac death, especially in young and middle-aged adults. Dilated cardiomyopathy of non-ischaemic aetiology is more common than once thought, with current prevalence estimated at around 1 in 220 based on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies, and the prevalence is twice as high in men than in women. However, the true prevalence could be even higher when early or subclinical forms of the disease are considered. Advances in genetic technologies over the past three decades have led to improved understanding of the genetic basis of non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy and the identification of pathogenic variants in 30–40% of patients. The genetic architecture of this disease is complex and heterogeneous. Rather than being a strictly monogenic disorder, dilated cardiomyopathy results from a combination of monogenic and polygenic factors, along with gene–environment interactions as critical modifiers of disease penetrance and phenotype. A deeper understanding of the genetic factors and epidemiological landscape of dilated cardiomyopathy is crucial for improving clinical management and optimizing screening protocols and public health strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramos et al. (2026) conducted a review in Non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: