Key result
Normalized Doppler velocity reserve of less than 2.0 identified coronary disease with 95% specificity and 94% sensitivity compared to perfusion scintigraphy.
Why the study?
Does poststenotic intravascular Doppler ultrasound accurately assess the functional severity of coronary artery stenosis compared to perfusion scintigraphy?
Observational (n=20)
Does poststenotic intravascular Doppler ultrasound accurately assess the functional severity of coronary artery stenosis compared to perfusion scintigraphy?
Poststenotic Doppler velocity reserve normalized to rate pressure product accurately characterizes the hemodynamic impact of coronary obstructions, showing high sensitivity and specificity compared to perfusion scintigraphy.
Supports Doppler assessment of stenosis severity in observational data; leaves open randomized outcome trials before clinical adoption.
This study sought to delineate the impact of the rate pressure product on intraluminal Doppler velocity measurements and to determine the relation between poststenotic vasodilator reserve and percent luminal obstruction in coronary vessels. Twenty patients with single-vessel coronary disease were studied prior to coronary angioplasty and at follow-up 6 months later. Intracoronary velocity reserve after administration of adenosine was measured distal to the stenosis with a Doppler-tipped guide wire and was compared to quantitative coronary angiography and adenosine myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. The rate pressure product was confirmed as significant covariate (ANCOVA, p < 0.005) of intracoronary Doppler reserve. When normalized to rate pressure product, poststenotic Doppler velocity reserve in stenosed arteries was significantly lower than in patent arteries as classified by quantitative coronary angiography (1.7 +/- 0.6 vs. 2.9 +/- 0.5, p < 0.001) and perfusion scintigraphy (1.5 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.8 +/- 0.5, p < 0.001). Normalized Doppler velocity reserve showed a nonlinear but highly significant relation to percent area stenosis [y = 3.0.(1 - exp[0.081 (x - 100)]), p < 0.001]. When normalized Doppler velocity reserve was less than 2.0, coronary disease was identified with 95% specificity and 94% sensitivity in comparison to perfusion scintigraphy. Thus, in coronary arteries poststenotic Doppler reserve and percent area stenosis show a significant nonlinear relation. Doppler velocity reserve when normalized to rate pressure product can be used to characterize the hemodynamic impact of coronary obstructions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Porenta et al. (2000) conducted an observational in Single-vessel coronary disease (n=20). Intracoronary Doppler velocity reserve measurement vs. Quantitative coronary angiography and adenosine myocardial perfusion scintigraphy was evaluated on Poststenotic Doppler velocity reserve in stenosed versus patent arteries (classified by quantitative coronary angiography) (p=<0.001). Normalized Doppler velocity reserve of less than 2.0 identified coronary disease with 95% specificity and 94% sensitivity compared to perfusion scintigraphy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: