Key result
Exercise in symptomatic AS linked to ~3 mmHg higher AV mean gradient without increasing stroke volume.
Why the study?
Assessing aortic stenosis severity remains challenging in some patients, and the current understanding of exercise hemodynamics in this population is limited.
How do transaortic gradients, aortic valve area, and stroke volume change during exercise in symptomatic patients with ≥ moderate aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF?
Observational (n=34)
How do transaortic gradients, aortic valve area, and stroke volume change during exercise in symptomatic patients with ≥ moderate aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF?
Effect estimate: Δ3 mmHg
p-value: p=<0.001
In symptomatic patients with ≥ moderate AS and preserved LVEF, exercise induces only small increases in transaortic mean gradient and no significant increase in stroke volume, while filling pressures frequently become elevated.
Supports symptom-limited exercise testing in symptomatic moderate AS with preserved LVEF; leaves open prognostic value of exertional hemodynamics.
Background The assessment of aortic stenosis (AS) severity remains a challenge in some patients, and hemodynamic exercise testing has been proposed as a diagnostic tool in this population. However, the current understanding of exercise hemodynamics in AS is limited. Methods Retrospective review of 34 adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with ≥ moderate AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) undergoing exercise invasive hemodynamics (supine cycle protocol) with simultaneous measurement of aortic and left ventricular pressures. Results Age was 77.1 (IQR 68.6; 84.1) years, and 50% were female. LVEF was 62.1 ± 6.6%. All patients were symptomatic. Resting aortic valve area (AVA) was 1.0 ± 0.2 cm 2 and aortic valve (AV) systolic mean gradient 22.0 ± 7.3 mmHg. At peak exercise (40 [IQR 30; 60] W), AV systolic mean gradient (Δ3 [0.6; 7] mmHg, p < 0.001) and AVA (Δ0.2 [0; 0.6] cm 2 , p = 0.002) significantly increased, while stroke volume (SV) did not (Δ6.8 ± 19.4 ml; p = 0.07). Exercise‐induced changes in AV systolic mean gradient were directly related to changes in cardiac output ( r = 0.53, p = 0.003), being inversely related to exercise systemic vascular resistance ( r = −0.60, p = 0.002). Elevated pulmonary artery wedge pressure was present in 41.2% at rest (≥ 15 mmHg) and 69.7% during exercise (≥ 25 mmHg). Conclusions Symptomatic patients with ≥ moderate AS and preserved LVEF experience small increases in AV mean gradient with exercise, and unlike the normal physiological response to exercise, there was no significant increase in SV. In most patients, AVA rose during exercise. Exercise‐induced elevation in filling pressures was highly prevalent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Abcha et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction (n=34). Exercise (supine cycle protocol) vs. Rest was evaluated on Change in aortic valve systolic mean gradient at peak exercise (Δ3 mmHg, p=<0.001). Exercise in symptomatic patients with ≥ moderate aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF mildly increased AV mean gradient (Δ3 mmHg, p<0.001) without significantly increasing stroke volume.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: