Key result
Pulsed reflected ultrasound accurately measured left ventricular wall thickness compared to direct measurements at necropsy or during open-heart surgery in 60 subjects.
Why the study?
Does pulsed reflected ultrasound accurately measure left ventricular wall thickness compared to direct measurement at necropsy or surgery?
Population
25 normal subjects and 35 patients in whom left ventricular wall thickness was measured either at necropsy…
Comparison
Pulsed reflected ultrasound for measuring left… vs Direct measurement at necropsy or during…
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
Supports non-invasive LV wall thickness assessment in research; leaves open routine clinical use without further validation.
Observational (n=60)
Does pulsed reflected ultrasound accurately measure left ventricular wall thickness compared to direct measurement at necropsy or surgery?
This early study validated the use of pulsed reflected ultrasound (echocardiography) as an accurate, non-invasive bedside tool for measuring left ventricular wall thickness.
Harvey Feigenbaum (1968) conducted an observational in Normal subjects and patients undergoing necropsy or open-heart surgery (n=60). Pulsed reflected ultrasound vs. Direct measurement at necropsy or during open-heart surgery was evaluated on Accuracy of left ventricular wall thickness measurement. Pulsed reflected ultrasound accurately measured left ventricular wall thickness compared to direct measurements at necropsy or during open-heart surgery in 60 subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: