Why the study?
Cardiovascular dimensions measured during pediatric echocardiograms require normalization for body size, but variables such as age and abnormal body habitus may confound their interpretation.
Do Z score equations adjusted for body size, BMI, and age reduce bias in pediatric echocardiography dimensions compared to BSA-only models?
Do Z score equations adjusted for body size, BMI, and age reduce bias in pediatric echocardiography dimensions compared to BSA-only models?
New Z score equations adjusting for sex, height, weight, BMI, and age reduce bias in pediatric echocardiography measurements compared to BSA-only models.
May improve pediatric echocardiography Z-score accuracy; cross-sectional data leave open prospective validation before adoption.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular dimensions measured during pediatric echocardiograms must be normalized for body size. However, other variables may confound their interpretation, such as age and abnormal body habitus. This retrospective cross-sectional study of the Canadian Congenital and Pediatric Cardiology Research Network aimed to create Z score equations for commonly measured dimensions in pediatric 2-dimensional echocardiography that were free of residual confounding effects of body size, body mass index, and age. METHODS: The reference sample consisted of >20 000 children without heart disease from 9 institutions who underwent clinical echocardiography that was reported as normal. A generalized additive model for location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS) was used to model the expected distributions of measurements as a function of sex, height, weight, body mass index, and age. RESULTS: Compared with a model that only considered body surface area, the proposed Z scores demonstrated less bias in subgroups of overweight, young, and early school-aged children. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed Z score equations may improve diagnostic and therapeutic accuracy by ensuring that body size, body mass index, and age do not confound the interpretation of measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lauzon-Schnittka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: