Key result
Higher BMI Z-scores skew BSA-based aortic dimensions lower, a bias eliminated by BMI-adjusted GAMLSS modeling.
Why the study?
Standard pediatric echocardiographic Z score nomograms derive mostly from eutrophic populations, leaving it unclear whether cardiac structure Z scores vary with body mass index across body-surface-area-based nomograms and whether a BMI-adjusted reference mitigates this bias.
Does a BMI-adjusted GAMLSS echocardiographic Z score reference mitigate BMI-related bias in cardiac structure Z scores compared to standard BSA-based nomograms in children and adolescents aged 5–18 years across the nutritional spectrum?
Observational (n=1,883)
No
Does a BMI-adjusted GAMLSS echocardiographic Z score reference mitigate BMI-related bias in cardiac structure Z scores compared to standard BSA-based nomograms in children and adolescents aged 5–18 years across the nutritional spectrum?
Standard BSA-based pediatric echocardiographic Z score nomograms systematically underestimate left-sided cardiac structure dimensions in children with overweight and obesity, a bias that is largely eliminated in aortic and chamber dimensions by using a BMI-adjusted GAMLSS reference.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Standard BSA nomograms may underestimate left-sided Z-scores in obese children; supports BMI-adjusted GAMLSS models but leaves validation to prospective studies.
Purpose Z score nomograms, the standard for interpreting pediatric echocardiographic dimensions, derive mostly from eutrophic populations. We assessed whether cardiac structure Z scores vary with body mass index Z score (BMIz) across four body-surface-area (BSA)-based nomograms, and whether a BMI-adjusted reference mitigates this bias. Methods Retrospective study of 1883 children aged 5–18 years with structurally normal echocardiograms (2016–2021). Eleven cardiac structure diameters were analyzed and Z scores computed with four nomograms (Pediatric Heart Network, Detroit, Toronto, Italy) and, for ten structures, with a fifth based on generalized additive models for location, scale and shape (GAMLSS) adjusted for body size, BMI and age. Associations with BMIz used linear regression in three nested models with false discovery rate correction. Results Overall, 25.8% were overweight and 15.8% had obesity. Absolute diameters increased with BMIz in every structure (p < 0.001), yet Z scores of most left-sided structures were inversely associated with it, most strongly for the four aortic levels (β − 0.325 to − 0.182, significant in all 45 nomogram-by-model comparisons) and for left ventricular end-diastolic diameter. Ventricular walls showed no consistent pattern; right-sided annuli varied non-monotonically. Under GAMLSS these associations were abolished in the most affected structures, persisted in the sinotubular junction and walls, and reversed in sign in the pulmonary annulus. Conclusion Z scores of most left-sided structures were lower in obesity than their absolute dimensions suggest, so interpretation must account for nutritional status and the reference. Persisting bias follows model construction: the three structures whose GAMLSS equations omit BMI are exactly those still biased.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amstein et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Structurally normal pediatric hearts across the nutritional spectrum (including overweight and obesity) (n=1,883). Body mass index Z score (BMIz) / Nutritional status (Overweight and Obesity) vs. Eutrophic status (BMIz -1 to +1) and comparison across four BSA-based nomograms vs a BMI-adjusted GAMLSS model was evaluated on Association between cardiac structure Z scores (specifically at the four aortic levels) and BMI Z score (BMIz) across BSA-based nomograms (β -0.325 to -0.182, p=<0.001). Higher BMI Z-scores were inversely associated with BSA-based Z-scores in left-sided structures, especially the aorta (β -0.325 to -0.182, p<0.001), a bias largely abolished by a BMI-adjusted GAMLSS model.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: