Key result
VT ablation in cardiac sarcoidosis yields ~48% 1-year VA-free survival, worse than idiopathic NICM.
Why the study?
Data on ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with probable cardiac sarcoidosis remain limited.
Does catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia yield different outcomes in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis compared to those with idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=63)
Does catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia yield different outcomes in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis compared to those with idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy?
Absolute Event Rate: 48% vs 85%
p-value: p=0.01
Patients with cardiac sarcoidosis have significantly worse 1-year arrhythmia-free and transplant-free survival after VT ablation compared to those with idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy.
Worse arrhythmia-free survival after VT ablation in cardiac sarcoidosis warrants caution; leaves open whether disease-specific strategies improve outcomes.
Introduction Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) may present clinically with ventricular tachycardia (VT). Since the diagnosis is challenging, clinical manifestations and imaging findings are commonly used to identify probable CS in patients without histological diagnosis or extracardiac sarcoidosis. However, data on VT ablation with probable CS remains limited. We investigated the scar distribution and long‐term outcomes of VT ablation in patients with at least probable CS and compared these with noninflammatory nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients. Methods and Results Patients with at least probable CS and VT, who underwent catheter ablation were retrospectively included (the CS group), and compared with idiopathic NICM patients in whom focal inflammation was excluded via fluorodeoxyglucose‐positron emission tomography (the noninflammatory NICM group). Procedural characteristics including scar distribution data along with postprocedural clinical outcomes were assessed. Twenty‐three and 40 patients were included in the CS and noninflammatory NICM groups, respectively. Left and right ventricular substrate mapping was performed in 48% and 57% of CS patients, and in 68% and 38% of noninflammatory NICM patients. Right ventricular map revealed a broader bipolar low‐voltage area and a more frequent unipolar low‐voltage area in the septum in the CS group, whereas left ventricle map demonstrated no significant differences. At 1‐year, ventricular arrhythmia‐free survival (48% vs. 85%, p = 0.01, after multiple procedures) and death/transplant‐free survival were lower in the CS group (54% vs. 97%, p < 0.01). Conclusion CS patients exhibited significantly worse outcomes after VT ablation, compared to noninflammatory NICM patients, highlighting the importance of distinguishing CS from idiopathic NICM to optimize patient management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hashimoto et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Ventricular tachycardia in cardiac sarcoidosis and idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy (n=63). Catheter ablation vs. Idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients was evaluated on 1-year ventricular arrhythmia-free survival (p=0.01). Catheter ablation for VT in cardiac sarcoidosis yielded lower 1-year ventricular arrhythmia-free survival than in idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy (48% vs 85%, p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: