Key result
FAST+ORI-CSPAMM provided comparable quantification of left ventricular mean peak twist to FAST+SPAMM (12.9 ± 3.4° vs 11.9 ± 4.0°; P=0.4) while correcting off-resonance and chemical shift artifacts.
Why the study?
Does FAST+ORI-CSPAMM provide comparable quantification of left ventricular twist parameters compared to FAST+SPAMM in healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=13)
Does FAST+ORI-CSPAMM provide comparable quantification of left ventricular twist parameters compared to FAST+SPAMM in healthy volunteers?
FAST+ORI-CSPAMM is a robust, semi-automated method for quantifying LV systolic and diastolic twist that performs comparably to the validated FAST+SPAMM technique while correcting for off-resonance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports artifact-corrected LV twist quantification in research; leaves open clinical adoption pending larger validation studies.
PURPOSE: To evaluate Off Resonance Insensitive Complementary SPAtial Modulation of Magnetization (ORI-CSPAMM) and Fourier Analysis of STimulated echoes (FAST) for the quantification of left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function and compare it with the previously validated FAST+SPAMM technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: LV short-axis tagged images were acquired with ORI-CSPAMM and SPAMM in healthy volunteers (n = 13). The FAST method was used to automatically estimate LV systolic and diastolic twist parameters from rotation of the stimulated echo and stimulated anti-echo about the middle of k-space subsequent to ∼3 min of user interaction. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between measures obtained for FAST+ORI-CSPAMM and FAST+SPAMM for mean peak twist (12.9 ± 3.4° versus 11.9 ± 4.0°; P = 0.4), torsion (3.3 ± 0.9°/cm versus 2.9 ± 1.0°/cm, P = 0.3), circumferential-longitudinal shear angle (9.1 ± 3.0° versus 8.2 ± 3.4°, P = 0.3), twisting rate (79.6 ± 20.2°/s versus 68.2 ± 23.4°/s, P = 0.1), untwisting rate (-117.5 ± 31.4°/s versus -106.6 ± 32.4°/s, P = 0.3), normalized untwisting rate (-9.3 ± 2.0/s versus -9.9 ± 4.4/s, P = 0.7), and time of peak twist (281 ± 18 ms versus 293 ± 25 ms, P = 0.04). FAST+ORI-CSPAMM also provided measures of duration of untwisting (148 ± 21 ms) and the ratio of rapid untwisting to peak twist (0.9 ± 0.3). Bland-Altman analysis of FAST+ORI-CSPAMM and FAST+SPAMM twist data demonstrates excellent agreement with a bias of -0.1° and 95% confidence intervals of (-1.0°, 3.2°). CONCLUSION: FAST+ORI-CSPAMM is a semi-automated method that provides a quick and quantitative assessment of LV systolic and diastolic twist and torsion. ORI-CSPAMM corrects off-resonance accrued during tagging preparation and readout and visibly removes chemical shift from the tagging pattern, which confers greater robustness to the derived quantitative measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reyhan et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=13). FAST+ORI-CSPAMM vs. FAST+SPAMM was evaluated on mean peak twist (p=0.4). FAST+ORI-CSPAMM provided comparable quantification of left ventricular mean peak twist to FAST+SPAMM (12.9 ± 3.4° vs 11.9 ± 4.0°; P=0.4) while correcting off-resonance and chemical shift artifacts.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: