Key result
High acoustic frame rates yield lower fetal biventricular longitudinal peak systolic strain versus 60 fps.
Why the study?
Elevated fetal heart rates necessitate higher frame rates for speckle tracking strain analysis, but the influence of high compared to low frame rates remains unclear.
Does high frame rate compared to low frame rate affect longitudinal peak systolic strain values in fetal echocardiography?
Observational (n=103)
Does high frame rate compared to low frame rate affect longitudinal peak systolic strain values in fetal echocardiography?
High frame rates in fetal echocardiography yield significantly lower longitudinal peak systolic strain values compared to low frame rates, highlighting the importance of frame rate standardization.
Frame rate standardization needed for fetal strain analysis; hypothesis-generating for optimal protocols and reference values.
OBJECTIVE: Compared to adults, fetal heart rates (HR) are elevated necessitating higher frame rates (FR) for strain analysis by speckle tracking echocardiography. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of high FR compared to low FR on strain analysis in 2D speckle tracking. METHODS: Fetal echocardiography was prospectively performed and acquired from the apical or basal four-chamber views of the heart. Images were optimized for clear delineation of myocardial walls and stored in either raw Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) cine-loop format for offline analysis with a low FR of 60 frames per second (fps) or in the original FR (acoustic FR = AFR). For each loop, right (RV) and left (LV) ventricular fetal longitudinal peak systolic strain (LPSS) values were assessed by 2D Wall Motion tracking. RESULTS: One hundred and three healthy fetuses were included with a mean gestational age of 26.3 ± 5.5 weeks. Mean AFR was 127 ± 26 fps. A mean FR/HR ratio was assessed of 0.42 and 0.90 between the low FR and AFR group, respectively. Relating to LPSS values, there was a significant difference between low FR and AFR for both ventricles (LV: -16.5% ± 3.9% (low FR) vs -13.6% ± 3.5% (AFR); and RV: -15.1% ± 3.6% (low FR) vs -12.6% ± 3.7% (AFR), both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Fetal LV and RV LPSS values derived with high AFR were significantly lower than corresponding LPSS values analyzed with low FR of 60 fps. Future studies are needed to clarify the clinical importance of this relationship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Enzensberger et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Healthy fetuses (n=103). High frame rate (acoustic FR) echocardiography vs. Low frame rate (60 fps) echocardiography was evaluated on Left ventricular longitudinal peak systolic strain (LPSS) (p=<0.001). Fetal left and right ventricular longitudinal peak systolic strain values derived with high acoustic frame rates were significantly lower than those analyzed with a low frame rate of 60 fps (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: