Key result
3-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Imaging accurately estimated LV regional longitudinal (r=0.89), radial (r=0.84), and circumferential (r=0.90) strain compared to sonomicrometry (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does 3-dimensional speckle tracking imaging accurately quantify regional myocardial deformation compared to sonomicrometry in an animal model?
Population
10 anesthetized sheep with sonomicrometry crystals implanted on the endocardium and epicardium at the LV…
Comparison
Three-dimensional speckle tracking imaging to… vs Sonomicrometry (reference standard)
Design
Preclinical
Authors
Loading...
Supports 3D-STI regional strain assessment in animals; leaves open human validation before clinical use.
Does 3-dimensional speckle tracking imaging accurately quantify regional myocardial deformation compared to sonomicrometry in an animal model?
Effect estimate: r=0.89 (LS), r=0.84 (RS), r=0.90 (CS)
p-value: p=<0.001
3D-STI is a reliable tool for estimating LV regional circumferential, longitudinal, and radial strain components, showing good correlation with sonomicrometry in an animal model.
Seo et al. (2009) studied Left ventricular myocardial function assessment (n=10). 3-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Imaging (3D-STI) vs. Sonomicrometry was evaluated on Correlation of segmental longitudinal (LS), radial (RS), and circumferential strain (CS) measurements (r=0.89 (LS), r=0.84 (RS), r=0.90 (CS), p=<0.001). 3-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Imaging accurately estimated LV regional longitudinal (r=0.89), radial (r=0.84), and circumferential (r=0.90) strain compared to sonomicrometry (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: