Key result
Higher ascending aortic stiffness and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity independently correlate with LV remodeling.
Why the study?
Does local and regional aortic stiffness correlate with left ventricular remodeling in individuals free of overt cardiovascular disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=146)
Does local and regional aortic stiffness correlate with left ventricular remodeling in individuals free of overt cardiovascular disease?
Effect estimate: partial R 0.07 (cfPWV) and 0.10 (aaPWV)
p-value: p=<0.005
Both local proximal aortic stiffness and regional aortic stiffness are independent determinants of left ventricular remodeling in individuals without overt cardiovascular disease.
Aortic stiffness may contribute to preclinical LV remodeling; hypothesis-generating and requires longitudinal confirmation before clinical consideration.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) remodeling and aortic stiffness have independent predictive value for all causes and cardiovascular mortality. Because elastic properties of the arterial wall vary along the aortic pathway, we hypothesized that local and regional aortic stiffness could differently impact on LV remodeling. METHODS AND RESULTS: Regional aortic stiffness was determined from carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) measured by aplanation tonometry. Aortic arch pulse wave velocity was measured by phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Local stiffness was calculated in the ascending aorta pulse wave velocity (aaPWV) and descending aorta pulse wave velocity using central pulse pressure measurement, cine CMR acquisition, and surface change estimation. CMR LV remodeling was expressed as LV mass to end-diastolic volume ratio.We evaluated 146 study participants (41 ± 15 years) free of overt cardiovascular disease. In stepwise multivariate regression analysis, cfPWV and aaPWV were significantly and independently correlated to mass to end-diastolic volume ratio (partial R = 0.07 and R = 0.10, respectively, all P < 0.005) after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, brachial mean blood pressure, and central pulse pressure. Descending aorta pulse wave velocity was correlated with mass to end-diastolic volume ratio to a lower extent (R = 0.04, P = 0.0115) and aortic arch pulse wave velocity was not independently associated with mass to end-diastolic volume ratio. CfPWV and aaPWV were both independently associated with mass to end-diastolic volume ratio, explaining 5 and 8% of mass to end-diastolic volume ratio variance, respectively. CONCLUSION: In study participants free of overt cardiovascular disease, stiffness of the ascending aorta representing the local proximal aortic function face to the LV and of the downstream aortic pathway assessed by cfPWV reflecting more advanced alterations of material properties involving the entire aorta, are independent determinants of LV remodeling after adjustment to age, BMI, mean blood pressure, and sex.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quinaglia et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Free of overt cardiovascular disease (n=146). Aortic stiffness assessment (cfPWV and aaPWV) was evaluated on Left ventricular remodeling (LV mass to end-diastolic volume ratio) (partial R 0.07 (cfPWV) and 0.10 (aaPWV), p=<0.005). Ascending aortic stiffness and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity were independently correlated with left ventricular remodeling (partial R=0.10 and R=0.07, respectively; P<0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: