Key result
Echocardiographic PR jet width/annulus ratio ≥0.5 predicted MRI pulmonary regurgitant fraction ≥20% with 94% sensitivity and 100% specificity in patients with repaired congenital heart disease.
Why the study?
Does echocardiography accurately predict pulmonary regurgitation severity compared to MRI in young patients with repaired congenital heart disease?
Observational (n=64)
Does echocardiography accurately predict pulmonary regurgitation severity compared to MRI in young patients with repaired congenital heart disease?
Echocardiographic PR jet width/annulus ratio combined with diastolic flow reversal provides high sensitivity for detecting significant pulmonary regurgitation but does not replace the need for MRI evaluation.
May support echocardiography for screening significant pulmonary regurgitation; leaves open whether it can replace MRI in repaired congenital heart disease.
OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary regurgitation (PR) is common after repair of congenital heart disease involving the right ventricular outflow tract. Because PR results in chronic right ventricular volume overload and associated morbidity and mortality, accurate assessment of its severity is important. The aim of this study was to compare echocardiography with the gold standard of PR quantitation by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a young population with repaired congenital heart disease. DESIGN/METHODS: Patients with congenital heart disease who had undergone right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction and/or pulmonary valve replacement and had an MRI within 3 months of an echocardiogram formed the study group. Echocardiographic indices were compared with MRI-determined pulmonary regurgitant fraction (PRF) to determine the most accurate measurements to quantitate PR. RESULTS: Of the 69 MRI/echocardiography pairs in 64 patients, 53 data sets were complete and used in the analysis. For the prediction of MRI PRF > or =20%, PR jet width/annulus ratio > or =0.5 demonstrated excellent sensitivity (94%), specificity (100%), positive predictive value (PPV 100%), and negative predictive value (NPV 82%). For the prediction of MRI PRF > or =40%, jet width/annulus ratio > or =0.7 and diastolic flow reversal in the branch pulmonary arteries showed useful sensitivity (92%), specificity (68%), PPV (76%), and NPV (88%). CONCLUSION: Pulmonary regurgitation jet width/annulus ratio combined with diastolic flow reversal is the most valuable echocardiographic measure for assessing PR severity after right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction or pulmonary valve replacement; however, this surrogate measure does not replace the importance of MRI evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Puchalski et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Pulmonary regurgitation in repaired congenital heart disease (n=64). Echocardiography vs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated on Accuracy of echocardiographic indices compared with MRI-determined pulmonary regurgitant fraction (PRF). Echocardiographic PR jet width/annulus ratio ≥0.5 predicted MRI pulmonary regurgitant fraction ≥20% with 94% sensitivity and 100% specificity in patients with repaired congenital heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: