Why the study?
The study compared pulmonary regurgitation volume (PRV) or indexed PRV (PRVi) with pulmonary regurgitation fraction (PRF) for assessing patients with pulmonary regurgitation undergoing CMR.
Does pulmonary regurgitation volume (PRV) correlate better with right ventricular dilation than pulmonary regurgitation fraction (PRF) in patients with pulmonary regurgitation?
Does pulmonary regurgitation volume (PRV) correlate better with right ventricular dilation than pulmonary regurgitation fraction (PRF) in patients with pulmonary regurgitation?
Pulmonary regurgitation volume (PRV) may be a better indicator of right ventricular dysfunction and predictor of worsening RV dilation than pulmonary regurgitation fraction (PRF), especially in moderate to severe PR.
PRV/PRVi may better indicate RV dysfunction than PRF; leaves open whether they should supplant PRF in clinical CMR reporting.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the use of pulmonary regurgitation volume (PRV) or indexed PRV (PRVi) with that of pulmonary regurgitation fraction (PRF) in the assessment of patients with pulmonary regurgitation (PR) undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CMR of 176 patients with PR were retrospectively evaluated. Their right ventricular diastolic (end-diastolic volume index [EDVi]) and systolic (end-systolic volume index) volume indexes, stroke volume, and ejection fraction were obtained from cine CMR sequences, whereas phase-contrast flow sequences were analyzed to obtain PRV, PRVi, and PRF. Patients were divided into subgroups, according to underlying pathology and according to PR severity. Correlations between PRV or PRF and RV parameters were studied through Spearman ρ, both in the main group and subgroups. Follow-up examinations were analyzed, and correlations between PRV or PRF from the first CMR examination and volume data from the second were calculated. RESULTS: Tetralogy of Fallot was the main setting of PR (98/179). Overall, EDVi strongly correlates with PRV (ρ=0.592, P<0.001) than with PRF (ρ=0.522, P<0.001), and end-systolic volume index strongly correlates with PRV (ρ=0.454, P<0.001) and PRF (ρ=0.406, P <0.001). As regards subgroup analysis, in moderate or severe PR patients, EDVi strongly correlates (P=0.043) with PRV (ρ=0.499, P<0.001) than with PRF (ρ=0.317, P<0.001). Follow-up EDVi correlates with PRV (ρ=0.450, P=0.031), but not with PRF. CONCLUSIONS: Especially when assessing moderate to severe PR, PRV and PRVi may be better indicators of right ventricular dysfunction than PRF. Moreover, PRV may be a predictor of worsening RV dilation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Secchi et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: