Key result
ACEi or ARB use is linked to ~36% higher odds of LVEF recovery in dilated cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether ACEi or ARB use is associated with heart failure with recovered ejection fraction in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
Does the use of ACEi or ARB improve LVEF recovery in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and LVEF < 40%?
Cohort (n=1,660)
Yes
Does the use of ACEi or ARB improve LVEF recovery in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and LVEF < 40%?
Effect estimate: OR 1.36 (95% CI 1.12-1.65)
Absolute Event Rate: 57% vs 49.3%
p-value: p=0.002
The use of ACEi or ARB is associated with a significantly higher likelihood of recovering ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 40%) at 3 years in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and reduced LVEF.
May support ACEi/ARB consideration in dilated cardiomyopathy with low LVEF; hypothesis-generating and leaves open need for RCTs.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) have been shown to prevent left ventricular remodeling and improve outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF). This study aimed to investigate whether the use of ACEi/ARB could be associated with HF with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).We collected individual patient data regarding demographics, echocardiogram, and treatment in DCM between 2003 and 2014 from the clinical personal record, a national database of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% were included. Eligible patients were divided into two groups according to the use of ACEi/ARB. A propensity score matching analysis was employed. The primary outcome was defined as LVEF ≥ 40% at 3 years of follow-up.Out of 5,955 patients with DCM and LVEF < 40%, propensity score matching yielded 830 pairs. The mean age was 58.8 years, and 1,184 (71.3%) of the patients were male. The primary outcome was observed more frequently in the ACEi/ARB group than in the no ACEi/ARB group (57.0% versus 49.3%; odds ratio 1.36; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.65; P = 0.002). Subgroup analysis revealed that the use of ACEi and ARB was associated with recovery of LVEF regardless of atrial fibrillation. The change in LVEF from baseline to 3 years of follow-up was greater in the ACEi-ARB group (14.9% ± 0.6% versus 12.3% ± 0.5%; P = 0.001).The use of ACEi/ARB is associated with HFrecEF in patients with DCM and reduced LVEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Enzan et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Dilated cardiomyopathy with reduced LVEF (n=1,660). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) vs. No ACEi/ARB was evaluated on LVEF ≥ 40% at 3 years of follow-up (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.12-1.65, p=0.002). The use of ACEi or ARB was associated with a higher rate of LVEF recovery to ≥40% at 3 years compared to no ACEi/ARB in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (57.0% vs 49.3%; OR 1.36; P=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: