Key result
Tenecteplase yielded numerically higher 90-day excellent functional outcomes vs standard treatment in late-window stroke patients with normal renal function (32.3% vs 24.2%; RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.94-1.75).
Why the study?
Does tenecteplase improve 90-day functional outcomes compared to standard medical treatment in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusions beyond the 4.5 hour window, across different strata of renal function?
RCT (n=510)
randomized
Does tenecteplase improve 90-day functional outcomes compared to standard medical treatment in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusions beyond the 4.5 hour window, across different strata of renal function?
Tenecteplase may offer functional benefits in late-window large vessel occlusion stroke patients with normal or mildly impaired renal function, though the risk-benefit ratio in moderate-to-severe renal dysfunction remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE: Concerns regarding bleeding risks have limited the use of intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with renal dysfunction (RD). This study investigated the impact of RD on the efficacy and safety of Tenecteplase (TNK) thrombolysis in AIS patients with large vessel occlusions (LVO) beyond the 4.5 h window. METHODS: This post hoc analysis of the Tenecteplase Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events-III (TRACE-III) Trial included 510 patients with LVO (4.5-24 h from onset) randomized to TNK (0.25 mg/kg) or standard medical treatment (SMT). Renal function was categorized as normal (eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m²), mild (eGFR 60-89), or moderate-to-severe RD (eGFR <60). Primary efficacy outcome was 90-day excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-1). Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), mortality and moderate or severe bleeding within 90 days. Multivariable regression and linear models were used to assess treatment effects across eGFR strata. RESULTS: In normal renal function patients (n = 410), TNK showed numerically higher excellent outcomes (32.3 % vs. 24.2 %, RR=1.28, 95 % CI 0.94∼1.75) and improved secondary outcomes (neurological improvement, as defined by NIHSS score reduction at 24 h/72 h/7 d and reperfusion rates), albeit with increased sICH (3.2 % vs. 1.1 %, p = 0.05). For mild RD (n = 82), TNK demonstrated a non-significant trend toward better functional outcomes (40.6 % vs. 26.0 %, RR=1.52, 95 % CI 0.78∼2.96). In moderate-to-severe RD (n = 18), outcomes were inconclusive due to limited sample size. CONCLUSION: TNK may benefit late-window LVO stroke patients with normal or mildly impaired renal function. The risk-benefit profile in moderate-to-severe RD remains uncertain, highlighting the need for larger prospective studies in this high-risk population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zong et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (n=510). Tenecteplase vs. Standard medical treatment was evaluated on 90-day excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-1) in patients with normal renal function (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.94-1.75). Tenecteplase yielded numerically higher 90-day excellent functional outcomes vs standard treatment in late-window stroke patients with normal renal function (32.3% vs 24.2%; RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.94-1.75).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: