Key result
Clinical interviewing reveals crucial psychosocial determinants and allostatic load but remains a neglected endocrinology skill.
Why the study?
Clinical interviewing is a basic yet neglected method threatened by time pressures and an emphasis on technology, despite its potential to aid shared decision-making and avoid unnecessary testing.
Clinical interviewing remains a crucial, cost-effective tool in endocrinology for understanding psychosocial determinants of health, improving patient-physician relationships, and guiding shared decision-making.
May support renewed emphasis on clinical interviewing in endocrinology; leaves open prospective evaluation of outcome benefits.
BACKGROUND: Interviewing is a basic, yet neglected clinical method that allows to understand how a person feels and what are the presenting complaints, obtain medical history, assess personal attitudes and behavior related to health and disease. In the endocrine setting it provides the patient with information about diagnosis, prognosis and treatment, and establishes a therapeutic relationship that is crucial for shared decision making and self-management. However, the value of this clinical skill is threatened by time pressures and emphasis on technology. Current health care trends privilege expensive tests and procedures and tag the time devoted to interaction with the patient as lacking cost-effectiveness. Instead, the time spent to enquire about problems and life setting may actually help to avoid further testing, procedures and referrals. METHODS: The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of optimal use of interviewing in clinical endocrinology. RESULTS: The basic principles of the art of interviewing are described, particularly as to medical diagnosis and history, health attitudes and behavior (including lifestyle), patient's experience of symptoms and quality of life, allostatic load and psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment by interviewing may indeed offer a characterization of the person's psychosocial environment that is missing from current formulations. It may shed light on a number of clinical issues, such as interpretation by the endocrinologist of abnormal hormone values that lack explanation, difficulties in coping with the various phases of illness, maladaptive illness behavior, presence of residual symptoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sonino et al. (2025) conducted a review in Endocrine diseases. Clinical interviewing was evaluated. Clinical interviewing is a fundamental but neglected skill in endocrinology that provides crucial information about psychosocial determinants of health, allostatic load, and patient experience.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: