Key result
Advanced MRI and atrophy biomarkers hold promise for evaluating neuroprotective treatments in progressive MS trials.
Why the study?
What are the applications, limitations, and future perspectives of imaging biomarkers in progressive multiple sclerosis clinical trials?
What are the applications, limitations, and future perspectives of imaging biomarkers in progressive multiple sclerosis clinical trials?
Imaging biomarkers such as brain/spinal cord atrophy and advanced MRI techniques are crucial for evaluating neuroprotective treatments in progressive multiple sclerosis trials.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet guide progressive MS trial design; leaves open prospective validation of atrophy measures as neuroprotective endpoints.
Imaging markers that are reliable, reproducible and sensitive to neurodegenerative changes in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) can enhance the development of new medications with a neuroprotective mode-of-action. Accordingly, in recent years, a considerable number of imaging biomarkers have been included in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials in primary and secondary progressive MS. Brain lesion count and volume are markers of inflammation and demyelination and are important outcomes even in progressive MS trials. Brain and, more recently, spinal cord atrophy are gaining relevance, considering their strong association with disability accrual; ongoing improvements in analysis methods will enhance their applicability in clinical trials, especially for cord atrophy. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques (e.g. magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), spectroscopy) have been included in few trials so far and hold promise for the future, as they can reflect specific pathological changes targeted by neuroprotective treatments. Positron emission tomography (PET) and optical coherence tomography have yet to be included. Applications, limitations and future perspectives of these techniques in clinical trials in progressive MS are discussed, with emphasis on measurement sensitivity, reliability and sample size calculation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moccia et al. (2017) conducted a review in Progressive multiple sclerosis. Imaging outcome measures was evaluated. Imaging biomarkers such as brain and spinal cord atrophy and advanced MRI techniques hold promise for progressive multiple sclerosis trials to evaluate neuroprotective treatments.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: