Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 1, 2002Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (Consort) in the Fracture Care Literature

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Application of the CONSORT guidelines in the fracture care literature was evaluated, but specific results were not provided in the available abstract.

Authors

MBMohit BhandariChandigarh University
Gordon Guyatt
Gordon GuyattMedical Council of Canada
HLHeather V. LochnerDiakonissenkrankenhaus

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Fracture trial reporting quality needs scrutiny; leaves open whether CONSORT adherence affects evidence reliability.

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Bhandari et al. (2002) studied this question. Application of the CONSORT guidelines in the fracture care literature was evaluated, but specific results were not provided in the available abstract.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e2485af86e8b097c832b2https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200203000-00023
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement1996 · 624 citations
  2. 2Clinical studies in surgical journals—have we improved?1993 · 141 citations
  3. 3Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials1996 · 3,167 citations
  4. 4An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of Treatment1988 · 1,703 citations
  5. 5The scandal of poor medical research1994 · 911 citations