Key result
High baseline NT-proBNP linked to ~172% higher mortality in levosimendan-treated advanced heart failure.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether baseline clinical characteristics predicted different survival functions in patients with advanced heart failure treated with intermittent inotropics.
Does baseline NT-proBNP >6000 pg/mL predict worse survival in patients with advanced heart failure treated with intermittent levosimendan?
Cohort (n=42)
No
Does baseline NT-proBNP >6000 pg/mL predict worse survival in patients with advanced heart failure treated with intermittent levosimendan?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients with advanced heart failure receiving intermittent levosimendan, baseline NT-proBNP >6000 pg/mL is a significant predictor of 1-year mortality, suggesting this subgroup requires closer monitoring.
Aims: To assess whether baseline characteristics (age, New York Heart Association functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction, glomerular filtration rate, systolic blood pressure, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide) predicted different survival functions in patients with advanced heart failure, treated with intermittent inotropics. Methods: Survival analysis based on a retrospective cohort of patients with advanced heart failure, treated with intermittent infusion of levosimendan and managed at heart failure clinic of the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, in Bogotá (Colombia). We evaluated which baseline characteristics were associated with worse survival outcomes, using Kaplan–Meier curves and log rank test. Results: Forty-two patients with advanced heart failure were included (mean age: 69.5 ± 13.2 years, 97.6% New York Heart Association III–IV, 54.7% of the population had quadruple therapy). A total of 39.5% died during 1-year follow-up. Survival functions were worse in patients with N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels >6000 pg/mL (HR: 2.72; 95% CI: 1.01–8.01, p = 0.0493). In contrast, no significant difference in mortality was found for those with basal GFR <60 versus ⩾60 ml/min ( p = 0.1030), left ventricular ejection fraction ⩽20% versus >20% ( p = 0.1040), systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg versus ⩾90 mmHg ( p = 0.2463), according to functional class ( p = 0.840) or age > 65 years ( p = 0.169). A significant increase of left ventricular ejection fraction measurements was observed in 26 surviving patients at 12 months of follow-up (20% vs 34%, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Our preliminary data suggest that the only characteristic that could predict worse survival in patients with advanced heart failure treated with levosimendan is N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels greater than 6000 pg/ml. Future research is needed to confirm our findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peña et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in advanced heart failure (n=42). intermittent infusion of levosimendan vs. baseline characteristics (e.g., NT-proBNP >6000 pg/mL) was evaluated on survival (HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.01-8.01, p=0.0493). In patients with advanced heart failure treated with levosimendan, baseline NT-proBNP >6000 pg/mL predicted worse survival (HR 2.72; 95% CI 1.01-8.01; p=0.0493).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: