Key result
Early-diastolic release flow detects LV apical aneurysms with ~90% sensitivity vs. 49% with 2D echo.
Why the study?
Left ventricular apical aneurysm in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy carries increased risks, and early diastolic release flow may serve as a more sensitive marker than standard 2D echocardiography.
Does early-diastolic release flow (EDRF) assessment on echocardiography improve the diagnostic sensitivity for detecting left ventricular apical aneurysms in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Observational (n=134)
No
Does early-diastolic release flow (EDRF) assessment on echocardiography improve the diagnostic sensitivity for detecting left ventricular apical aneurysms in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early diastolic release flow (EDRF) on continuous wave Doppler is a highly sensitive and specific echocardiographic marker that can reliably identify left ventricular apical aneurysms missed by standard 2D echocardiography in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Background: Left ventricular apical aneurysm (LVAA) is a rare but important finding in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) that is associated with increased risk for ventricular arrhythmia and thromboembolism. Doppler evidence of basally-directed flow during early diastole representing the release of pressurized blood volume during ventricular relaxation may serve as a more sensitive marker for LVAA than standard 2D echocardiography. Methods: HCM patients with LVAA and available echocardiography were enrolled. Clinical echocardiographic studies were assessed for evidence of early-diastolic release flow (EDRF), defined as basally-directed flow identified in early diastole. Sensitivity of EDRF for detection of LVAA was compared to alternative imaging modalities. In patients with repeat echocardiography at 5-years, changes in aneurysm size and EDRF flow characteristics were assessed. Results: 51 HCM patients with LVAA were enrolled. While standard 2d echocardiography had low sensitivity for LVAA (25/51, 49%), EDRF was detected in 46/51 patients (90%). In the subset of patients for whom LVAA was missed on 2D echocardiography, sensitivity of EDRF remained high (26/26, 100%). In patients with 5-year longitudinal imaging (n=16, 31%), mean aneurysm size increased (17mm vs 25mm, p-value=0.0002) and LVEF decreased (62% vs 54%, p-value=0.002); EDRF visualization was lost in 4 (25%). Specificity of EDRF for LVAA diagnosis was 96.4% in control patients with apical variant HCM. Conclusions: EDRF is a sensitive early echocardiographic marker of LVAA that is most useful for LVAA that would otherwise be missed on standard 2D echocardiography. Identification should prompt definitive testing with CMR or contrast-enhanced echocardiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bukhari et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular apical aneurysm (LVAA) (n=134). Early-diastolic release flow (EDRF) assessment vs. Standard 2D echocardiography was evaluated on Sensitivity for detection of LVAA. Early-diastolic release flow demonstrated 90.2% sensitivity for detecting left ventricular apical aneurysms compared to 49.0% for standard 2D echocardiography, and achieved 96.4% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: