Key result
Single-plane 30 degree RAO ventriculograms adequately evaluate hypokinesis in acute myocardial infarction, except in patients with circumflex thrombosis where the LAO projection is more sensitive.
Why the study?
Does biplane analysis provide additional value over single plane 30 degree RAO analysis for measuring regional wall motion in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=102)
Does biplane analysis provide additional value over single plane 30 degree RAO analysis for measuring regional wall motion in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Single-plane 30 degree RAO ventriculography is generally adequate for evaluating regional wall motion in acute myocardial infarction, except in cases of circumflex thrombosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports single-plane RAO ventriculography for most AMI cases; leaves open biplane value in circumflex thrombosis.
The value of performing biplane vs single plane analysis of regional wall motion from contrast ventriculograms was determined in 102 patients who received thrombolytic therapy and who underwent biplane ventriculography during acute myocardial infarction (n = 67), at follow-up more than 2 weeks later (n = 80), or both (n = 45). Hypokinesis in the infarct region and hyperkinesis in the noninfarct region were measured by the centerline method in the respective artery territories, which were defined from the data of 62 patients with single-vessel disease and were expressed in units of standard deviations from the mean of 32 normal subjects. Hypokinesis was more severe and extended over a longer segment of the left ventricular contour when measured in the right anterior oblique (RAO) projection in thrombosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) but more severe and extensive in the left anterior oblique (LAO) projection in circumflex stenosis. Hyperkinesis opposite the LAD or the circumflex was greater in the LAO projection. In patients with thrombosis of the right coronary artery, wall motion abnormalities were similar in the two projections. Thus the evaluation of hypokinesis caused by acute coronary thrombosis and of the effect of therapeutic interventions in salvaging function can be adequately evaluated from single-plane 30 degree RAO ventriculograms, except in the small minority of patients with circumflex thrombosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheehan et al. (1986) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (n=102). 30 degree right anterior oblique (RAO) projection vs. 60 degree left anterior oblique (LAO) projection was evaluated on Hypokinesis in the infarct region and hyperkinesis in the noninfarct region. Single-plane 30 degree RAO ventriculograms adequately evaluate hypokinesis in acute myocardial infarction, except in patients with circumflex thrombosis where the LAO projection is more sensitive.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: