Key result
Novel haemodynamic stratification improves passive tilt test sensitivity for reflex syncope in athletes to 85%.
Why the study?
Does a novel stratification based on haemodynamic criteria improve the diagnostic accuracy of the tilt test for reflex syncope in athletes?
Observational (n=132)
Does a novel stratification based on haemodynamic criteria improve the diagnostic accuracy of the tilt test for reflex syncope in athletes?
Incorporating haemodynamic criteria (TPRI and CI) into the interpretation of passive tilt testing significantly improves its sensitivity for diagnosing reflex syncope in athletes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support haemodynamic stratification during tilt testing in athletes; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: The tilt test is used for the diagnosis of reflex syncope (RS) and is characterized by low sensitivity, especially in athletes. The objective of the study was the implementation of a novel diagnostic strategy for the tilt test without pharmacologic provocation in athletes based on haemodynamic criteria. METHODS: A passive tilt test for 30 min was performed in 132 athletes (53 with a history of RS, 79 without RS). Measurement of haemodynamic, heart rate variability (HRV) and baroreflex sensitivity parameters was performed. RESULTS: Tilt testing yielded 34% sensitivity and 94% specificity. Among negative tilt test responders, the ones with RS had increased heart rate (HR) (89 ± 11 vs 81 ± 10 bpm, p < 0.001), stroke index (SI) (40.2 ± 7.1 vs 35.5 ± 9.7 ml/m(2), p = 0.013), cardiac index (CI) (3.5 ± 0.6 vs 2.8 ± 0.8 l/(min·m(2)), p < 0.001) and decreased total peripheral resistance index (TPRI) (2230 ± 362 vs 2965 ± 725 dyne·s m(2)/cm(5), p < 0.001), low frequency component of HRV (76.2% (49.0-88.4) vs 79.7% (10.2-91.1), p = 0.045) during head-up tilt, compared with those without RS. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that among athletes with a negative tilt test the area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.727 (0.626-0.828) for HR (p < 0.001), 0.707 (0.611-0.804) for SI (p = 0.001), 0.847 (0.774-0.920) for CI (p < 0.001), 0.830 (0.754-0.905) for TPRI (p < 0.001). Further stratification of negative tilt test responders, characterizing their results as positive when TPRI <2800 dyne·s m(2)/cm(5) and CI >3 l/(min·m(2)), resulted in 85% sensitivity and 76% specificity. CONCLUSION: Our results provide supportive evidence that a novel stratification based on haemodynamic criteria can improve the sensitivity of the tilt test for the diagnosis of RS in athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christou et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Reflex syncope (n=132). Passive tilt test with haemodynamic criteria vs. Standard passive tilt test was evaluated on Sensitivity for diagnosis of reflex syncope. A novel stratification based on haemodynamic criteria improved the sensitivity of the passive tilt test for diagnosing reflex syncope in athletes from 34% to 85%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: