Key result
TVSymp shows high reproducibility across postural and cognitive stress tests over five days.
Why the study?
Indices of HRV and EDA are useful for assessing sympathetic control but are highly influenced by factors introducing variability, requiring assessment of their consistency under controlled conditions.
Are time-varying indices of electrodermal activity and heart rate variability reproducible measures of sympathetic autonomic control during postural and cognitive stress in healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=20)
No
Are time-varying indices of electrodermal activity and heart rate variability reproducible measures of sympathetic autonomic control during postural and cognitive stress in healthy volunteers?
The time-varying index of electrodermal activity (TVSymp) provides a highly reproducible noninvasive measure of sympathetic autonomic control during both postural and cognitive stress.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports TVSymp as a research tool in healthy volunteers; leaves open validation before clinical autonomic assessment.
Heart rate variability (HRV) and electrodermal activity (EDA) are useful tools for assessing the central and peripheral dynamics of the sympathetic nervous system and detecting the effects of numerous systemic diseases and life-challenging situations. However, the indices of HRV and EDA are highly influenced by mental stress, environmental conditions, body position, and other physiological conditions that introduce variability. In this paper, we assessed the five-day reproducibility of HRV and EDA measures of sympathetic control, for N = 20 subjects undergoing 70° head-up tilt test (HUT) and Stroop task tests. We made the assessment in highly controlled conditions without environmental causes of variability, to have a good baseline understanding of the consistency of the various indices of HRV and EDA. Therefore, we assessed intra-subject variation (using the coefficient of variation, CV) and consistency (using the intra-class correlation coefficient, ICC) of the test-to-baseline differences produced by both tests on the studied measures. The low-frequency component of HRV (HRVLF), and its normalized variant was computed as HRV measures of sympathetic control. For EDA, the skin conductance level, frequency of non-specific skin conductance responses, spectral index (EDASympn), and time-varying index (TVSymp) were computed. TVSymp (ICC = 0.85) and HRV indices exhibited higher consistency during the HUT (ICC ≥ 0.8), compared to other EDA measures, and HRVLF was the least variable measure (CV = 85.4%). EDA indices exhibited higher consistency (except for the EDASympn) during the Stroop task (ICC ≥ 0.79) when compared to HRV, and TVSymp was the least variable measure (CV = 97.2%). Remarkably, TVSymp proved to be a reproducible measurement (low variation and high consistency) in both scenarios. These results are the necessary groundwork for studying the use of EDA and HRV in real-world conditions, as reproducibility of the indices has remarkable importance in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Posada–Quintero et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=20). 70° head-up tilt (HUT) test and Stroop task vs. Baseline (supine rest) was evaluated on Reproducibility of TVSymp during HUT (Intra-class correlation coefficient). The time-varying index of electrodermal activity (TVSymp) demonstrated high consistency and low variability across both postural and cognitive stress tests over five days.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: