Key result
Interatrial shunt devices increase LVEF by ~3% in patients with heart failure.
Why the study?
Recent studies have shown that interatrial shunt devices can improve cardiac function and exercise tolerance in heart failure, motivating an assessment of their overall efficacy.
Does interatrial shunt device implantation improve left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=182)
Does interatrial shunt device implantation improve left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with heart failure?
Interatrial shunt device implantation in patients with heart failure is associated with a modest increase in LVEF and improvements in functional capacity and NT-proBNP levels.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Modest LVEF gains with interatrial shunts require randomized confirmation; leaves open effects on clinical outcomes in heart failure.
Background Recent studies have shown that interatrial shunt devices (ISDs) can improve cardiac function and exercise tolerance in people with heart failure (HF). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy of ISDs in the treatment of HF. Methods The Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed databases were searched through to December 7, 2022, to identify clinical studies that evaluated the effect of ISDs on HF. The primary endpoint was change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Secondary endpoints included left atrial volume index, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, right ventricular diameter, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion. Clinical functional capacity, including the 6-minute walk distance, New York Heart Association functional class, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level, were also evaluated. Results Six trials that included 182 individuals were included in the quantitative analysis. Pooled analyses showed that LVEF increased by a mean of 3.07% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30, 5.84; P = 0.03) after ISDs implantation. There was no significant change in left atrial volume index (mean difference [MD] -0.33 mL/m², 95% CI -4.80, 4.13; P = 0.88; I 2 = 0), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (MD -0.53 cm, 95% CI -1.58, 0.53; P = 0.33; I 2 = 80%), right ventricular diameter (MD 1.40 mm, 95% CI -1.72, 4.51; P = 0.38; I 2 = 36%), or tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (MD 0.74 mm, 95% CI -0.49, 1.98; P = 0.24; I 2 = 0) after ISDs implantation. The 6-minute walk distance, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level, and New York Heart Association functional class were improved. Conclusions An ISDs can increase LVEF in patients with HF. Studies in larger sample sizes and with longer follow-up times are needed to confirm our findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure (n=182). Interatrial Shunt Devices (ISDs) vs. Baseline (pre-procedure) was evaluated on Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD 3.07%, 95% CI 0.30-5.84, p=0.03). Interatrial shunt devices significantly increased left ventricular ejection fraction by a mean of 3.07% compared to baseline in patients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: