Why the study?
Patients with HFpEF have limited evidence of benefit from pharmacological therapy, and elevated left ventricular filling pressure during exercise leads to pulmonary congestion.
Does transcatheter implantation of interatrial shunt devices improve hemodynamics and symptoms in patients with heart failure?
Does transcatheter implantation of interatrial shunt devices improve hemodynamics and symptoms in patients with heart failure?
Interatrial shunt devices represent a promising new paradigm for treating heart failure, particularly HFpEF, by unloading left atrial pressure during exercise.
Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) constitutes a considerable sized population like that of subjects with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The symptoms include exercise induced dyspnoea and fatigue besides an increased mortality rate when compared to the general population. There is limited evidence of benefit from pharmacological therapy. A main pathophysiological mechanism is a left ventricular filling pressure that might be near to normal during resting conditions but increases during exercise leading to pulmonary congestion. Based on observations like the apparent lesser symptomatology in patients with combined mitral valve stenosis and atrial septal defect (Lutembacher syndrome) when compared to patients with isolated mitral valve stenosis, several Inter-Atrial Shunt Devices (IASD) have been developed with the intent to unload the pressure in the left atrium by creating a shunt into the right atrium. Smaller studies have found that the IASDs reduce the left ventricular filling pressure during exercise and increase the functional status of patients both subjectively and objectively with reported low rates of complications. These devices are undergoing further investigations and might prove to be a new paradigm in the treatment of patients with HFpEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jørgensen et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: