Left heart catheterisation by the femoral approach was complicated by cholesterol embolism in 7 of 4587 procedures, frequently resulting in progressive renal failure (5/7) and death (4/7).
Case Report (n=7)
What are the clinical manifestations and outcomes of cholesterol embolism following left heart catheterisation?
Cholesterol embolism is a rare but serious complication of left heart catheterisation by the femoral approach, often presenting with renal failure, cutaneous signs, and eosinophilia.
Cholesterol embolism after left heart catheterisation by the femoral approach was diagnosed in seven men (mean age 59.6 years) out of a total of 4587 catheterisations. Diabetes was present in four patients, systemic hypertension in three, and signs of extensive atherosclerosis in six; five patients were taking anticoagulant drugs. Acute pain in the legs or abdomen occurred in six patients, two of whom had abdominal angina; renal failure was present in six patients, cutaneous manifestations in five, and a cholesterol embolus was seen in the retina in one. Six out of six patients had an appreciable increase in the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and five out of five had eosinophilia within a week of catheterisation. Renal failure was progressive in five patients, one of whom required haemodialysis. Three patients required amputation of the toes because of gangrene. Four patients died within four and a half months of catheterisation from causes not directly related to cholesterol embolism. At necropsy cholesterol emboli were found in all four patients. Cholesterol embolism is a rare but serious complication of left heart catheterisation.
Drost et al. (Sat,) conducted a case report in Cholesterol embolism (n=7). Left heart catheterisation by the femoral approach was evaluated. Left heart catheterisation by the femoral approach was complicated by cholesterol embolism in 7 of 4587 procedures, frequently resulting in progressive renal failure (5/7) and death (4/7).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: