Key result
Aortic banding triggers progressive myocardial fibrosis, whereas isoprenaline induces stable endomyocardial scarring.
Why the study?
The temporal sequence and structural relationship between perivascular and interstitial fibrosis and microscopic scarring in the left ventricle in response to a transient versus sustained stimulus to fibrosis needed comparison.
Does a sustained stimulus (abdominal aortic banding with right renal artery constriction) compared to a transient stimulus (isoprenaline) produce different temporal sequences and structural patterns of perivascular and interstitial fibrosis in the rat left ventricle?
Does a sustained stimulus (abdominal aortic banding with right renal artery constriction) compared to a transient stimulus (isoprenaline) produce different temporal sequences and structural patterns of perivascular and interstitial fibrosis in the rat left ventricle?
Demonstrates that renovascular hypertension drives progressive reactive perivascular and interstitial myocardial fibrosis, whereas catecholamine-induced necrosis results in stable, localized reparative scarring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Different stimuli yield distinct fibrosis patterns in rat LV; extends remodeling models but leaves open human translation.
Study objective The aim was to compare the temporal sequence and structural relationship between perivascular and interstitial fibrosis and microscopic scarring seen in the left ventricle in response to either a transient or sustained stimulus to fibrosis. Design In 72 male Wistar rats (250-350 g) the transient stimulus model was based on the administration of isoprenaline (500 micrograms.kg-1) while the sustained stimulus model was produced by abdominal aortic banding with right renal artery constriction. Serial sections of myocardium were examined and compared at 4 and 12 weeks in each model and to corresponding controls. Experimental material The collagen specific stain, Sirius Red F3BA, was used to determine collagen volume fraction and the fibrillar nature of the fibrous tissue response seen by light microscopy. Measurements and main results Following isoprenaline a stable reparative fibrosis of the endomyocardium and increase in collagen volume fraction was seen without an interstitial or perivascular fibrosis of the non-involved myocardium. In unilateral renal ischemia, on the other hand, a progressive perivascular fibrosis was evident throughout the myocardium and from which fibrillar collagen extended into the extracellular space between muscle bundles creating an interstitial fibrosis; microscopic scarring of the endomyocardium became evident at 12 weeks. Conclusions The reactive perivascular fibrosis of intramyocardial coronary arteries seen in renovascular hypertension is a progressive process that leads to an interstitial fibrosis and eventual microscopic scarring. In contrast, the endomyocardial scarring that follows isoprenaline induced myocyte necrosis is stable and intramural vessels in remote regions are not involved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silver et al. (1990) studied Hypertrophied rat left ventricle / myocardial fibrosis (n=72). Isoprenaline administration vs. abdominal aortic banding with right renal artery constriction vs. Corresponding controls was evaluated on Collagen volume fraction and fibrillar nature of perivascular, interstitial, and microscopic scarring fibrosis in the left ventricle. Abdominal aortic banding with renal artery constriction caused progressive perivascular/interstitial fibrosis and scarring at 12 weeks, whereas isoprenaline caused stable endomyocardial fibrosis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: