Why the study?
Dispersion-based inversion methods for arterial shear wave elastography rely on a priori knowledge of vibrational modes, where differences between anticipated and real modal content cause inversion errors.
Does prescribing specific ultrasound acoustic radiation force excitations improve the accuracy of shear wave elastography in arterial models?
Does prescribing specific ultrasound acoustic radiation force excitations improve the accuracy of shear wave elastography in arterial models?
Controlling the arterial response to ultrasound perturbation by selectively exciting odd waveguide modes can potentially improve the accuracy of shear wave elastography for arterial characterization.
Selective odd-mode excitation may improve arterial shear wave elastography accuracy; leaves open clinical translation beyond phantoms and animals.
Dispersion-based inversion has been proposed as a viable direction for materials characterization of arteries, allowing clinicians to better study cardiovascular conditions using shear wave elastography. However, these methods rely on a priori knowledge of the vibrational modes dominating the propagating waves induced by acoustic radiation force excitation: differences between anticipated and real modal content are known to yield errors in the inversion. We seek to improve the accuracy of this process by modeling the artery as a fluid-immersed cylindrical waveguide and building an analytical framework to prescribe radiation force excitations that will selectively excite certain waveguide modes using ultrasound acoustic radiation force. We show that all even-numbered waveguide modes can be eliminated from the arterial response to perturbation, and confirm the efficacy of this approach with in silico tests that show that odd modes are preferentially excited. Finally, by analyzing data from phantom tests, we find a set of ultrasound focal parameters that demonstrate the viability of inducing the desired odd-mode response in experiments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hugenberg et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: