Key result
LBBAP achieves ~92% implantation success and narrows QRS duration in patients with baseline QRS >120ms.
Why the study?
As a new technology, left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is still in the stage of clinical exploration and lacks adequate evaluation.
Does permanent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) provide stable pacing parameters and improve electrocardiogram characteristics in pacemaker-indicated patients?
Comparison
Permanent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP)
Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Loading...
Supports LBBAP adoption as physiological pacing alternative; extends HBP evidence with high success and QRS narrowing in wide-complex cases.
Meta-Analysis (n=618)
Does permanent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) provide stable pacing parameters and improve electrocardiogram characteristics in pacemaker-indicated patients?
Permanent left bundle branch area pacing is a feasible physiological pacing modality with a high implantation success rate (92.1%) and stable pacing parameters.
Gao et al. (2020) conducted a meta-analysis in Pacemaker-indicated patients (n=618). Permanent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) was evaluated on Overall successful rate for implantation. Permanent left bundle branch area pacing achieved an overall implantation success rate of 92.1% and significantly narrowed QRS duration in patients with baseline QRS >120ms (P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: