Key result
CRT-D cuts fast VT/VF risk ~36% in mild heart failure only when LVEF ≤30%.
Why the study?
Does CRT-D reduce the risk of fast VT/VF compared to ICD in patients with mild heart failure, and is this effect modified by baseline LVEF?
RCT (n=1,783)
Does CRT-D reduce the risk of fast VT/VF compared to ICD in patients with mild heart failure, and is this effect modified by baseline LVEF?
Effect estimate: HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.48-0.85)
p-value: p=0.002
In patients with mild heart failure, the antiarrhythmic benefit of CRT-D is attenuated with increasing left ventricular function, showing significant reduction in fast VT/VF only in those with LVEF ≤ 30%.
AIMS: We hypothesized that the relationship between LVEF and the risk of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTAs) may modify the effect of a CRT device with a defibrillator (CRT-D) on VTA risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: The risk of fast (≥200 b.p.m.) ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) and the benefit of CRT-D in reducing VT/VF were assessed by baseline LVEF (categorized as ≤30% or 30% and assessed as a continuous measurement) in 1783 patients with mild heart failure (HF) implanted with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or CRT-D, enrolled in MADIT-CRT. Higher LVEF (>30%) at baseline was associated with a significantly lower risk of fast VT/VF [hazard ratio (HR) 0.54, P = 0.006], VT/VF (HR 0.62, P = 0.005), and VT/VF/death (HR 0.64, P = 0.003). Treatment with CRT-D was shown to reduce the risk of fast VT/VF in patients with LVEF ≤ 30% (n = 1100) [HR 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.85, P = 0.002], but not among those with LVEF > 30% (n = 683) (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.73-1.91, P = 0.502, interaction P-value = 0.03). When LVEF was assessed as a continuous measure, each 5% increment was shown to be associated with a significant 30% (P < 0.001) reduction in the risk for fast VT/VF, and with a corresponding linear reduction in the benefit of CRT-D in reducing fast VTA risk (P -value for treatment by LVEF interaction = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that in mild HF patients with cardiomyopathy there is an inverse correlation between LVEF and the risk of life-threatening VTAs, possibly contributing to the attenuation in the antiarrhythmic properties of CRT with increasing left ventricular function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00180271.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kutyifa et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in mild heart failure (HF) (n=1,783). CRT device with a defibrillator (CRT-D) vs. implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was evaluated on fast (≥200 b.p.m.) ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.85, p=0.002). Treatment with CRT-D reduced the risk of fast VT/VF in mild heart failure patients with LVEF ≤30% (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.48-0.85; P=0.002), but not in those with LVEF >30% (interaction P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: