Key result
Continuous DOACs show no difference in postoperative bleeding compared to warfarin during tooth extractions.
Why the study?
No consistent approach to DOAC management during and after oral surgery has been established, leading to potential unnecessary discontinuation and risks of life-threatening thromboembolism.
Does continuous use of DOACs compared to warfarin reduce postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing tooth extraction?
Cohort (n=210)
Yes
Does continuous use of DOACs compared to warfarin reduce postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing tooth extraction?
Continuous use of DOACs during tooth extraction is safe and associated with a similar or potentially lower risk of bleeding compared to warfarin, avoiding the need for therapy interruption.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support uninterrupted DOAC use during extraction; leaves open need for randomized trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND: No consistent approach to the management of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) during and after oral surgery has been established. Thus, DOACs may be unnecessarily discontinued, raising the potential risk of life-threatening thromboembolism. To address the inconsistency in this approach, our study assessed the risk of bleeding and other complications in patients who continue to use DOACs during and after simple and surgical tooth extractions. METHODS: Between May 2016 and December 2023, this prospective study recruited patients aged 18 years or older who were receiving a DOAC or warfarin and were in need of simple or surgical extractions of one or more teeth. Local haemostatic agents were being used to control bleeding. Patients were instructed to manage minor postoperative bleeding at home by biting down on gauze soaked in tranexamic acid for at least 30 min. After surgery, all patients were followed for 7 days. The chi-squared test compared dichotomous variables; the two-sample t-test, continuous variables; logistic regressions, dichotomous outcomes; and linear regressions, continuous outcomes. RESULTS: In all, 354 teeth were extracted from 160 patients receiving DOACs and 56 patients receiving warfarin. The incidence of any type of postoperative bleeding was 27% in patients receiving DOACs and 37% in those receiving warfarin (OR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.28-1.57; p = 0.35). Most patients were able to manage any bleeding at home themselves. Clinically relevant bleeding necessitating prompt evaluation or a secondary surgical intervention by a dentist or healthcare professional occurred in 3% of patients receiving DOACs and 11% of patients receiving warfarin (OR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.08-1.06; p = 0.06). No reports of major bleeding requiring hospitalization or blood transfusion were found. Perioperative bleeding volume was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving DOACs without interruption during surgery may have a lower risk of bleeding than those on warfarin. Patients may safely continue to use DOACs during and after simple and surgical extractions. This eliminates the potentially higher risk of serious thromboembolic events that are associated with a pause in anticoagulant therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04662515). Retrospectively registered 4 December 2020.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johansson et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Patients requiring simple or surgical tooth extractions while on anticoagulant therapy (n=210). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Warfarin (INR ≤ 3.1) was evaluated on Any type of postoperative bleeding within 7 days (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.28-1.57, p=0.35). Continuous use of direct oral anticoagulants during tooth extractions resulted in a 27% incidence of postoperative bleeding compared to 37% with warfarin, showing no significant difference.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: