Key result
Aspirin prescribing reaches ~49% in type 2 diabetes patients, with higher use in shared care.
Why the study?
Aspirin benefits secondary cardiovascular prevention in type 2 diabetes, but primary prevention benefits remain unproven, prompting evaluation of prescribing appropriateness across care settings.
Is aspirin prescribed appropriately for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes across different care settings?
Cross-Sectional (n=400)
Yes
Is aspirin prescribed appropriately for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes across different care settings?
A significant proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes are inappropriately prescribed aspirin for primary prevention or underprescribed for secondary prevention, highlighting gaps in guideline adherence.
Prescribing patterns suggest variable guideline adherence for aspirin in type 2 diabetes by care setting; hypothesis-generating for optimizing prevention strategies.
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. Use of aspirin has been shown to be of benefit for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes; benefits in primary prevention have not been clearly proven. AIMS: This study aims to (a) determine if aspirin is prescribed appropriately in type 2 diabetes for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and (b) evaluate whether there are differences in aspirin prescribing according to where people receive their care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study METHODS: The medical records of individuals with type 2 diabetes aged over 18 years and attending Elmwood Primary Care Centre and Cork University Hospital Diabetes outpatient clinics (n = 400) between February and August 2017 were reviewed. RESULTS: There were 90 individuals exclusively attending primary care and 310 persons attending shared care. Overall, 49.0% (n = 196) of those were prescribed aspirin, of whom 42.3% were using it for secondary prevention. Aspirin was used significantly more in people attending shared care (p < 0.001). About 10.8% of individuals with diabetes and CVD attending shared care met guidelines for, but were not prescribed aspirin. CONCLUSION: A significant number of people with type 2 diabetes who should have been prescribed aspirin for secondary prevention were not receiving it at the time of study assessment. In contrast, a substantial proportion who did not meet criteria for aspirin use was prescribed it for primary prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes (n=400). Aspirin was evaluated on Aspirin prescription rate. Aspirin was prescribed to 49.0% of patients with type 2 diabetes, with significantly higher use in shared care compared to primary care (p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: